Tolling and Pricing Program - Links to Tolling and Pricing Program Home

A Compendium of Existing HOV Lane Facilities in the United States

Federal Highway Administration
HOV Lane Performance

DTFH61-06-D-00006

Prepared for the

HOV Pooled-Fund Study
and the
U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration

Prepared by

Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
8283 Greensboro Drive
McLean, VA 22102

HNTB

Under contract to
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

December 2008

Technical Documentation Page

Printable Version [PDF 2.1MB]
To view PDF files, you need the Adobe Acrobat Reader.
Contact Information: Operations Feedback at Operations Feedback@dot.gov



NOTICE

This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or the use thereof.

The contents of this Report reflect the views of the contractor, who is responsible for the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Transportation.

This Report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers named herein. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the objective of this document.


Table of Contents

Introduction

Summary Information

Arizona (5 facilities)

Arizona Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Arizona Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

California (88 facilities)

California Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

California Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Colorado (5 facilities)

Colorado Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Colorado Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Connecticut (9 facilities)

Connecticut Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Connecticut Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Florida (2 facilities)

Florida Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Florida Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Georgia (5 facilities)

Georgia Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Georgia Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Hawaii (11 facilities)

Hawaii Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Hawaii Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Illinois (1 facility)

Illinois Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Illinois Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Louisiana (1 facility)

Louisiana Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Louisiana Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Maryland (4 facilities)

Maryland Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Maryland Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Massachusetts (2 facilities)

Massachusetts Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Massachusetts Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Michigan (1 facility)

Michigan Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Michigan Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Minnesota (83 facilities)

Minnesota Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Minnesota Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Nevada (1 facility)

Nevada Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Nevada Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

New Jersey (5 facilities)

New Jersey Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

New York (5 facilities)

New York Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

New York Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

North Carolina (2 facilities)

North Carolina Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

North Carolina Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Oregon (1 facility)

Oregon Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Oregon Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Pennsylvania (3 facilities)

Pennsylvania Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Pennsylvania Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Tennessee (10 facilities)

Tennessee Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Tennessee Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Texas (35 facilities)

Texas Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Texas Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Utah (4 facilities)

Utah Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Utah Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Virginia (21 facilities)

Virginia Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Virginia Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics

Washington State (41 facilities)

Washington Table 1: Geographic and Infrastructure Characteristics

Washington Table 2: Policy and Utilization Characteristics


DOT logo

U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Operations

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov

Next

December 2008
FHWA-HOP-09-030

Office of Operations