Contact: Operations Feedback at OperationsFeedback@dot.gov.
Publication No. FHWA-HOP-07-066
Final Report
Managing Pedestrians During
Evacuation of Metropolitan Areas
U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
Quality Assurance Statement
This material is based upon work supported by the Federal Highway Administration under Contract Number DTFH61-01-C-00182. The Federal Highway Administration provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Highway Administration.
Managing Pedestrians During
Evacuation Of Metropolitan Areas
Publication No. FHWA-HOP-07-066 | March 2007 |
Prepared by
Center for Human Performance and Safety
Patricia A. Bolton
1100 Dexter Ave N.
Seattle, WA 98109
Prepared for
Federal Highway Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation|
Washington, DC 20590
Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
March 2007
Dear Colleague,
Emergencies can occur at any time, any place. We all need to be prepared to take immediate actions to move out of harm’s way quickly from wherever we are at the time. The September 11(or 9/11), 2001, attacks on the high-profile workplaces of the World Trade Center (WTC) in New York City and the Pentagon in the Washington, D.C. area, made real the impact of an unexpected, or “no-notice,” event in a metropolitan setting. News coverage of the events of 9/11 showed thousands of people leaving the area of the WTC on foot. The evacuation from the borough of Manhattan included not only the typical traffic congestion expected in an evacuation in the United States, but thousands of pedestrians moving along with, or among, the vehicles. However, unexpected emergencies causing people to evacuate an area can result from transportation accidents, hazardous materials releases, earthquakes, flash flooding and other natural and man-made causes.
When a large-scale, damaging event has occurred or the imminent threat of one has become known, transportation agencies, working with public safety and emergency management officials, focus on two traditional, principal objectives:
Evidence that large numbers of pedestrians may be part of an evacuation raised questions within the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) about what actions are needed to manage pedestrian traffic during metropolitan evacuations and what FHWA can contribute in this area to ensure safe and effective movement of pedestrians while minimizing their impact on vehicular movement. This study resulted from these inquiries.
This document is one of a series of publications that FHWA has been producing to aid local, State and Federal authorities in designing evacuation and other types of emergency transportation operations plans. While transportation authorities have responsibility for developing transportation-specific plans, we expect that they are being done in the construct of the community’s or State’s emergency management planning efforts. We encourage our transportation partners to share information in this and other ETO guides with their emergency managers and first responders and to watch for new publications in the Emergency Transportation Operations series, found on http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/opssecurity or the ETO page on https://www.llis.dhs.gov.
Jeffrey F. Paniati
Associate Administrator for Operations
Federal Highway Administration
Technical Report Documentation Page
1. Report No.
FHWA-HOP-07-066 |
2. Government Accession No.
|
3. Recipient's Catalog No.
|
||||
4. Title and Subtitle
Managing Pedestrians during Evacuations of Metropolitan Areas |
5. Report Date March 2007 |
|||||
6. Performing Organization Code
|
||||||
7. Author(s) Patricia A. Bolton, Ph.D. |
8. Performing Organization Report No.
|
|||||
9. Performing Organization Name and Address Battelle Human Factors Transportation Center 505 King Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43201
|
10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS)
|
|||||
11. Contract or Grant No. DTFH61-01-C00182/BA82 |
||||||
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered
Final Group |
|||||
14. Sponsoring Agency Code HOTO, FHWA |
||||||
15. Supplementary Notes Kimberly Vasconez, FHWA Office of Operations, Office of Transportation Operations, Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR). Work on this document was accomplished through a contract to Battelle. |
||||||
16. Abstract
The September 11(or 9/11), 2001, attacks on the high-profile workplaces of the World Trade Center (WTC) in New York City and the Pentagon in the Washington, D.C. area, made real the impact of an unexpected, or “no-notice,” event in a metropolitan setting. The news coverage of the events of 9/11 showed thousands of people leaving the area of the WTC on foot. The evacuation from the borough of Manhattan included not only the typical traffic congestion expected in an evacuation in the United States, but thousands of pedestrians moving along with, or among, the vehicles.
When a large-scale, damaging event has occurred or the imminent threat of one has become known, transportation agencies working with public safety officials have traditionally had two principal objectives:
Evidence that large numbers of pedestrians may be part of an evacuation raised questions within the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) about what actions are needed to manage pedestrian traffic during metropolitan evacuations and what FHWA can contribute in this area to ensure safe and effective movement of pedestrians while minimizing their impact on vehicular movement.
|
||||||
17. Key Words Metropolitan Areas Evacuations; Pedestrian Evacuations; No-notice Evacuations; Transportation planning and operations, Evacuation decision making and behavior; Social and behavioral research on evacuation behavior, Crowd and pedestrian flow modeling; Intelligent Transportation Operations |
18. Distribution Statement
No restrictions. |
|||||
19. Security Classif. (of this report) Unclassified |
20. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified |
21. No. of Pages 91 |
22. Price |
|||
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized
2 Literature and Case Study Review
2.1 Methods for Identifying Literature
2.2 Major Findings from the Literature Review
2.3 Sources of Information on Evacuation
2.3.1 Newspaper and Internet Sources
2.3.2 Transportation Research on Evacuation Planning
2.3.5 Evacuation Decision Making
2.3.7 Modeling Pedestrian Crowd Behavior
2.4 Case Studies of Transportation Operations in No-Notice Events
2.5 Emergency Response After-Action Reports
2.5.1 New York City World Trade Center Bombing, 1993
2.5.2 Oklahoma City Murrah Federal Building Bombing, 1995
2.5.3 Tokyo Subway Sarin Gas Attack, 1995
2.5.4 Pentagon Attack, September 11, 2001
2.5.5 Northeast Blackout, New York City, August 2003
3 Interviews with Practitioners
3.1 Selection of Evacuation Events
3.2 Findings from Interviews with Practitioners
3.2.1 Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Region
3.2.3 The San Francisco Bay Area
3.2.6 Observations from a Regional Planner
4 Identification of Variables and Concepts
4.1 Evacuation Context and Management
4.1.1 Variables in the Event Situation and Volume of Evacuees
4.1.2 Evacuation Management Assumptions and Strategies
4.2 Multi-Disciplinary Panel Discussion
4.2.1 Ability to Adapt General Response Concepts to Specific Events
4.2.2 City Characteristics and Planning for Pedestrians in Emergencies
4.2.3 Facilitation of Decision Making by Pedestrian Evacuees
4.2.4 Multi-Jurisdictional Planning
4.2.5 Elaboration of the Role of the Transportation Agency
5 Approaches to Managing Pedestrian Evacuation
5.1 No-Notice Urban Evacuation
5.2 Assumptions about Urban Evacuation Behavior
5.2.1 Driving, Riding, and Walking as Evacuation Options
5.2.2 Reducing Pedestrian Evacuation as a Safety Strategy
5.3 Three Approaches for Managing Pedestrian Evacuation
5.3.1 Separation of Vehicle and Pedestrian Streams
5.3.2 Evacuation Transit Hubs to which Pedestrians Can Walk
5.3.3 “Bus Bridges” to Move Pedestrians out of the Dangerous Zone
5.4 Minimizing Mixed Pedestrian and Vehicle Congestion
5.4.1 Prohibit or Minimize Private Vehicle Evacuation..
5.4.2 Prohibit or Minimize Evacuation on Foot
5.4.3 Prohibit or Minimize Evacuation
6 Conclusions and Research Recommendations
6. 3 Research Opportunities and Issues
6.3.1 Research on the Past Evacuations
6.3.2 Research on the Next Evacuation
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Evacuation Situations Selected for Interviews with Practitioners
FHWA Home |
Feedback | FHWA Privacy Policy
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration |