Guide to Project Coordination for Minimizing Work Zone Mobility Impacts
Printable Version [PDF, 3 MB]
You may need the AdobeĀ® ReaderĀ® to view the PDFs on this page.
Contact Information: Work Zone Feedback at WorkZoneFeedback@dot.gov
U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Operations
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
FHWA-HOP-16-013
April 2016
Notice
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document.
The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers' names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document.
Quality Assurance Statement
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement.
Technical Report Documentation Page
1. Report No. FHWA-HOP-16-013 |
2. Government Accession No. | 3. Recipient's Catalog No. | |
4. Title and Subtitle Guide to Project Coordination for Minimizing Work Zone Mobility Impacts |
5. Report Date April 2016 |
||
6. Performing Organization Code |
|||
7. Author(s) LuAnn Theiss (TTI); Gerald Ullman (TTI); Amy Moinet (Battelle) |
8. Performing Organization Report No. | ||
9. Performing Organization Name and Address Battelle 505 King Avenue Columbus, OH 43201 Texas A&M Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843-3135 |
10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) | ||
11. Contract or Grant No. DTFH61-12-D-00046-T-14009 |
|||
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations (HOP) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final Report; March 2014-March 2016 |
||
14. Sponsoring Agency Code | |||
15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Todd Peterson, project lead |
|||
16. Abstract Under the Every Day Counts (EDC) program, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is promoting technologies and practices that can shorten the project delivery process, enhance durability and safety, reduce congestion, and improve environmental sustainability. The focus is on providing efficiency through technology and collaboration. This includes strategies for Project Coordination (PC) which can be applied to a single project, or more commonly, among multiple projects within a corridor, network, or region, and possibly across agency jurisdictions, to minimize work zone impacts and produce time and cost savings. The purpose of this document is to provide guidance on implementing PC in the planning, design, and delivery phases of projects. It summarizes key steps for successfully implementing PC, using a systematic approach to meet a specific set of clearly defined objectives. The steps include:
Two case studies are included to demonstrate successful application of the approach. |
|||
17. Key Words Work zones, project coordination, mobility |
18. Distribution Statement No restrictions. |
||
19. Security Classif. (of this report) Unclassified |
20. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified |
21. No. of Pages 59 |
22. Price |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
- CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
- CHAPTER 2. KEY CONCEPTS OF PROJECT COORDINATION (PC)
- CHAPTER 3. CASE STUDIES OF PROJECT COORDINATION
- CHAPTER 4. EXAMPLES OF USEFUL TOOLS TO FACILITATE PROJECT COORDINATION
- CHAPTER 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- CHAPTER 6. REFERENCES
- APPENDIX – RESOURCES FOR LEARNING MORE ABOUT PROJECT COORDINATION
List of Tables
- Table 1. Project Coordination Matrix
- Table 2. Resources for Learning More about Project Coordination
List of Figures
- Figure 1. Illustration. Project Coordination Dimensions.
- Figure 2. Process Flow. Steps to Establishing a Project Coordination Process in a Region.
- Figure 3. Map. I-35 Construction Limits.
- Figure 4. Report. Lane Closure Assessment System Report for Lane Closure 2822 on April 1, 2015.
- Figure 5. Chart. Southbound Corridor Travel Time Calculation for 8 pm Departure without Coordination.
- Figure 6. Report. Modified Lane Closure Assessment System Report for Lane Closure 2822 on April 1, 2015.
- Figure 7. Chart. Southbound Corridor Travel Time Calculation for 8 pm Departure with Coordination.
- Figure 8. Graph. Southbound Corridor Travel Times on April 1, 2015.
- Figure 9. Map. Location of Bridges in the State Bridge Delivery Program.
- Figure 10. Map. Oregon DOT Regions.
- Figure 11. Map. Oregon Bridge Delivery Partners Construction Stages for Corridors.
- Figure 12. Map. Motor Carrier Transport Division Freight Mobility Map.
- Figure 13. Map. Corridor Segments.
- Figure 14. Map. Three Bridge Projects in Segment 4A.
- Figure 15. Screen Capture. Florida Department of Transportation District 4 Utility Coordination Information for Project 428727 in Broward County.
- Figure 16. Screen Capture. Geographic Information System-based Project Data Sharing.
- Figure 17. Screen Capture. City of Palo Alto Geographic Information System-based Project Map.
SI* (MODERN METRIC) CONVERSION FACTORS
APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Symbol | When You Know | Multiply By | To Find | Symbol |
LENGTH |
||||
in |
inches | 25.4 | millimeters | mm |
ft |
feet | 0.305 | meters | m |
yd |
yards | 0.914 | meters | m |
mi |
miles | 1.61 | kilometers | km |
AREA |
||||
in2 |
square inches | 645.2 | square millimeters | mm2 |
ft2 |
square feet | 0.093 | square meters | m2 |
yd2 |
square yard | 0.836 | square meters | m2 |
ac |
acres | 0.405 | hectares | ha |
mi2 |
square miles | 2.59 | square kilometers | km2 |
VOLUME |
||||
fl oz |
fluid ounces | 29.57 | milliliters | mL |
gal
|
gallons | 3.785 | liters | L |
ft3 |
cubic feet | 0.028 | cubic meters | m3 |
yd3
|
cubic yards | 0.765 | cubic meters | m3 |
NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 |
||||
MASS |
||||
oz
|
ounces | 28.35 | grams | g |
lb |
pounds | 0.454 | kilograms | kg |
T |
short tons (2000 lb) | 0.907 | megagrams (or "metric ton") | Mg (or "t") |
TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) |
||||
oF |
Fahrenheit | 5 (F-32)/9 or (F-32)/1.8 |
Celsius | oC |
ILLUMINATION |
||||
fc |
foot-candles | 10.76 | lux | lx |
fl |
foot-Lamberts | 3.426 | candela/m2 | cd/m2 |
FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS |
||||
lbf |
poundforce | 4.45 | newtons | N |
lbf/in2 |
poundforce per square inch | 6.89 | kilopascals | kPa |
APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS FROM SI UNITS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Symbol | When You Know | Multiply By | To Find | Symbol |
LENGTH |
||||
mm |
millimeters | 0.039 | inches | in |
m |
meters | 3.28 | feet | ft |
m |
meters | 1.09 | yards | yd |
km |
kilometers | 0.621 | miles | mi |
AREA |
||||
mm2 |
square millimeters | 0.0016 | square inches | in2 |
m2 |
square meters | 10.764 | square feet | ft2 |
m2 |
square meters | 1.195 | square yards | yd2 |
ha |
hectares | 2.47 | acres | ac |
km2 |
square kilometers | 0.386 | square miles | mi2 |
VOLUME |
||||
mL |
milliliters | 0.034 | fluid ounces | fl oz |
L |
liters | 0.264 | gallons | gal |
m3 |
cubic meters | 35.314 | cubic feet | ft3 |
m3 |
cubic meters | 1.307 | cubic yards | yd3 |
MASS |
||||
g |
grams | 0.035 | ounces | oz |
kg |
kilograms | 2.202 | pounds | lb |
Mg (or "t")
|
megagrams (or "metric ton") | 1.103 | short tons (2000 lb) | T |
TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) |
||||
oC |
Celsius | 1.8C+32 | Fahrenheit | oF |
ILLUMINATION |
||||
lx |
lux | 0.0929 | foot-candles | fc |
cd/m2
|
candela/m2 | 0.2919 | foot-Lamberts | fl |
FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS |
||||
N |
newtons | 0.225 | poundforce | lbf |
kPa
|
kilopascals | 0.145 | poundforce per square inch | lbf/in2 |
(Revised March 2003)