Office of Operations Active Transportation and Demand Management
Table of Contents

Guide for Highway Capacity and Operations Analysis of Active Transportation and Demand Management Strategies

9 References

  1. Federal Highway Administration. Ramp Management and Control, A Primer. FHWA-HOP-06-080, Washington, D.C., January 2006
  2. Federal Highway Administration. Technologies That Complement Congestion Pricing, A Primer. FHWA-HOP-08-043, Washington, D.C., October 2008.
  3. Federal Highway Administration. Managed Lanes, A Primer. FHWA-HOP-05-031, FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2005.
  4. Federal Highway Administration and University of Florida. National Signal Timing Optimization Project Summary Evaluation Report. May 1982.
  5. Perez, B. and G.C. Sciara. A Guide for HOT Lane Development. FHWA-OP-03-009, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2003.
  6. Levinson, D. and L. Zhang. Ramp Meters on Trial: Evidence from the Twin Cities Metering Holiday. Transportation Research Part A, 40, 2006.
  7. Zhang, L. and D. Levinson. Ramp Metering and Freeway Bottleneck Capacity. Transportation Research: A Policy and Practice 44(4), May 2010, pp. 218-235.
  8. Cassidy, M. J. and J. Rudjanakanoknad. Empirical Study of Ramp Metering and Capacity. UCB-ITS-RR-2002-5, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2002.
  9. Cambridge Systematics. Twin Cities Ramp Meter Evaluation. Oakland, California., February 2001.
  10. Jacobson, L., J. Stribiak, L. Nelson, and D. Sallman. Ramp Management and Control Handbook. FHWA-HOP-06-001, U.S. DOT, Washington, D.C., January 2006.
  11. 2009 MUTCD, Chapter 6I, “Control of Traffic Through Traffic Incident Management Areas,” Accessed January 24, 2012.
  12. Sullivan, E. C. and J. El Harake. The CA Route 91 Toll Lanes – Observed Impacts and Other Observations. Transportation Research Record 1649, TRB, Washington, D.C., 1998.
  13. Federal Highway Administration. Benefits of Using Intelligent Transportation Systems in Work Zones: A Summary Report. FHWA-HOP-08-021, Washington, D.C., April 2008.
  14. Wolshon B. and L. Lambert. NCHRP Synthesis Report 340: Convertible Roadways and Lanes. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004.
  15. Chang, M., J. Wiegmann, and C. Billotto. A Compendium of Existing HOV Lane Facilities in the United States. FHWA-HOP-09-030, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., December 2008.
  16. Turnbull, K.F. Potential Impact of Exempt Vehicles on HOV Lanes. FHWA-HOP-05-058, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2005.
  17. Texas Transportation Institute; Parsons Brinckerhoff, Quade, and Douglass, Inc.; and Pacific Rim Resources. NCHRP Report 414: HOV Systems Manual. TRB, Washington, D.C., 1998.
  18. Kittelson & Associates, Inc.; KFH Group, Inc.; Parsons Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglass, Inc.; and K. Hunter-Zaworski. TCRP Report 100: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
  19. Srinivas, S. The Benefits of Retiming Traffic Signals. ITE Journal, April 2004.
  20. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. SHRP 2 C05 Working Paper #2: Inventory of Existing Strategies and Tactics. Kittelson & Associates, Inc., Portland, Oregon, 2009.
  21. Neudorff, L. G., J. E. Randall, R. Reiss, and R. Gordon. Freeway Management and Operations Handbook. FHWA-OP-04-003, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., September 2003.
  22. Allaby, P., B. Hellinga, and M. Bullock. Variable Speed Limits: Safety and Operations Impacts of a Candidate Control Strategy for an Urban Freeway. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2007.
  23. ITRE, “Reliability Methodology for Freeway Facilities in the HCM,” North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 2012.
  24. Bonneson, J., “Urban Street Travel Time Reliability – Prediction Methodology,” 2011.
  25. Weather Underground, “Weather History,” 2012. (On-line). (Accessed 23 5 2012).
  26. California Highway Patrol, “Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS),” (On-line). (Accessed May 2012).
  27. Kentucky State Police, “Kentucky Collision Analysis for the Public,” (On-line). (Accessed May 2012).
  28. Skabardonis, A., Petty, K. F., Bertini, R. L., Varaiya, P. P., Noeimi, H., and Rydzewski, D., “The I 880 Field Experiment: Analysis of the Incident Data,” Transportation Research Record, No. 1603, pp. 72 79, 1997.
  29. “Highway Safety Manual 2010,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011.
  30. “Highway Economic Requirements System – State Version: Technical Report,” Federal Highway Administration, 2005.
  31. “IDAS User’s Manual,” 2003.
  32. Yeo, H., Jang, K., Skabardonis, A., and Kang, S., “Impact of Traffic States on Freeway Crash Involvement Rates,” In Press, Accident Analysis and Prevention.
  33. Raub, R. A. and Schofer, J. L., “Managing Incidents on Urban Arterial Roadways,” Transportation Research Record, No. 1603, pp. 12 19, 1997.

previous | next