UCR April 2016-June 2016 (FY 2016, Q3)
PDF Version 992KB
PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®
A Snapshot of Year-to-Year Congestion Trends in the U.S. for April 2016 through June 2016.
Congested Hours
+11 minutes
Average duration of daily congestion
Travel Time Index
+2 point
Peak period vs. off-peak travel times
Planning Time Index
+4 points
Unreliability (variability) of travel
Performance measures have been updated using the most recently available (2013) national volumes.
City (MSA) | Congested Hours * | Travel Time Index * | Planning Time Index * | % Complete Data | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | Change from 2015 | 2016 | Change from 2015 | 2016 | Change from 2015 | ||
Atlanta, GA | 4:23 | +0:16 | 1.33 | +3 | 2.42 | +5 | 97% |
Austin, TX | 5:12 | -0:02 | 1.46 | +5 | 2.89 | -1 | 98% |
Baltimore, MD | 5:52 | +0:09 | 1.27 | +1 | 2.42 | +1 | 96% |
Birmingham, AL | 0:41 | +0:04 | 1.04 | +1 | 1.35 | 0 | 97% |
Boston, MA | 6:28 | +0:18 | 1.42 | 0 | 2.86 | -8 | 94% |
Buffalo, NY | 5:26 | -0:04 | 1.15 | 0 | 2.02 | +10 | 87% |
Charlotte, NC | 4:01 | +0:36 | 1.25 | +4 | 2.25 | +4 | 99% |
Chicago, IL | 7:49 | +0:18 | 1.42 | 0 | 2.46 | -10 | 97% |
Cincinnati, OH | 2:54 | -0:45 | 1.17 | -2 | 1.95 | -3 | 98% |
Cleveland, OH | 2:25 | -0:16 | 1.13 | -1 | 1.90 | -4 | 96% |
Columbus, OH | 2:58 | +0:21 | 1.15 | +1 | 1.94 | +6 | 96% |
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX | 6:17 | +0:12 | 1.36 | +2 | 3.10 | +20 | 97% |
Denver, CO | 6:40 | -0:41 | 1.36 | -1 | 2.76 | -14 | 93% |
Detroit, MI | 4:22 | +0:30 | 1.30 | +9 | 2.65 | +22 | 95% |
Hartford, CT | 3:10 | +0:21 | 1.15 | 0 | 2.00 | +3 | 95% |
Houston, TX | 6:05 | +0:08 | 1.38 | -2 | 3.07 | -1 | 97% |
Indianapolis, IN | 3:07 | +0:38 | 1.13 | +2 | 1.65 | +9 | 96% |
Jacksonville, FL | 3:45 | +0:14 | 1.17 | +2 | 2.27 | +22 | 96% |
Kansas City, MO | 3:18 | 0:00 | 1.13 | 0 | 1.96 | +5 | 95% |
Las Vegas, NV | 4:14 | +0:43 | 1.20 | +3 | 2.15 | +18 | 96% |
Los Angeles, CA | 8:54 | +0:21 | 1.67 | +8 | 3.47 | +4 | 97% |
Louisville, KY | 3:28 | +0:31 | 1.16 | 0 | 2.32 | +21 | 96% |
Memphis, TN | 4:53 | +1:03 | 1.21 | +2 | 2.06 | +11 | 97% |
Miami, FL | 5:35 | +0:32 | 1.32 | +2 | 2.69 | +7 | 96% |
Milwaukee, WI | 3:54 | +0:25 | 1.22 | +1 | 2.17 | +11 | 95% |
Minn.-St. Paul, MN | 5:57 | +0:06 | 1.35 | +1 | 2.72 | +8 | 91% |
Nashville, TN | 2:55 | -0:10 | 1.17 | -2 | 2.00 | +3 | 95% |
New Orleans, LA | 4:29 | +0:03 | 1.21 | +3 | 2.50 | +2 | 95% |
New York, NY | 8:51 | -0:20 | 1.37 | 0 | 2.71 | -2 | 92% |
Oklahoma City, OK | 2:23 | -0:11 | 1.11 | -2 | 1.85 | +1 | 98% |
Orlando, FL | 3:57 | +0:28 | 1.18 | +2 | 2.15 | +22 | 98% |
Philadelphia, PA | 5:47 | +0:50 | 1.24 | +1 | 2.18 | -4 | 94% |
Phoenix, AZ | 3:09 | -0:07 | 1.21 | -1 | 2.34 | +9 | 95% |
Pittsburgh, PA | 4:40 | +0:12 | 1.17 | +1 | 2.13 | +3 | 92% |
Portland, OR | 7:39 | +0:07 | 1.50 | 0 | 3.26 | +6 | 92% |
Providence, RI | 5:08 | +0:15 | 1.17 | 0 | 2.09 | +9 | 91% |
Raleigh, NC | 2:31 | +0:22 | 1.15 | +3 | 1.95 | +12 | 98% |
Richmond, VA | 2:02 | -0:02 | 1.06 | -1 | 1.51 | -2 | 94% |
Riverside-San Bern., CA | 5:03 | -0:09 | 1.24 | 0 | 1.93 | -6 | 99% |
Rochester, NY | 3:06 | +0:27 | 1.09 | +1 | 1.77 | +13 | 89% |
Sacramento, CA | 4:26 | +0:23 | 1.26 | +2 | 2.23 | +1 | 98% |
Salt Lake City, UT | 3:08 | +0:06 | 1.16 | +1 | 1.89 | -2 | 97% |
San Antonio, TX | 3:29 | +0:03 | 1.20 | +2 | 2.17 | +2 | 98% |
San Diego, CA | 4:05 | +0:03 | 1.28 | +4 | 2.62 | +15 | 96% |
San Francisco, CA | 7:19 | +0:16 | 1.52 | +3 | 3.28 | +7 | 97% |
San Jose, CA | 5:34 | +0:16 | 1.47 | +5 | 3.21 | 0 | 96% |
San Juan, PR | 3:17 | +0:05 | 1.46 | 0 | 2.90 | +33 | 65% |
Seattle, WA | 7:24 | -0:03 | 1.41 | 0 | 2.88 | +9 | 91% |
St. Louis, MO | 3:42 | +0:14 | 1.17 | +1 | 2.21 | +6 | 98% |
Tampa, FL | 3:03 | +0:16 | 1.23 | +1 | 2.24 | -6 | 97% |
Virginia Beach, VA | 6:03 | +0:05 | 1.25 | +1 | 2.63 | +1 | 94% |
Washington, DC | 7:40 | -0:02 | 1.54 | +5 | 3.23 | +7 | 95% |
Notes:
Blue bolded values (with – sign) indicate improving conditions; red italics (with + sign) indicate worsening conditions.
Comparison of 2016 to 2015 is for the same three-month period (April - June).
% Complete Data compares the reported congestion data for that MSA to what should have been available for the designated roads and time periods.
*Performance measures have been updated using the most recently available (2013) national volumes.
For More Information
Please contact Rich Taylor at rich.taylor@dot.gov.