Office of Operations
21st Century Operations Using 21st Century Technologies
Table of contents

Does Travel Time Reliability Matter? - Primer

References

  1. Aringhieri, R., Bruni, M.E., Khodaparasti, S., and Van Essen, J.T. (2017). "Emergency Medical Services and Beyond: Addressing New Challenges Through a Wide Literature Review," Computers and Operations Research, 78, pp. 349–368.
  2. Office of Freight Management and Operations. (2005). Freight Info: Measuring Travel Time in Freight-Significant Corridors, Report No. FHWA-HOP-05-036, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/documents/travel_time_flyer.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 2 ]
  3. Taylor, J., Casavant, K., Moore, D., and Ivanov, B. (2013). "The Economic Impact of Increased Congestion for Freight-Dependent Businesses in Washington State," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, 52(3), pp. 25–40.
  4. Wilson, A.M. (2016). "Quantifying the True Cost of Transit: Case Study of Bus Routes in Boulder, Colorado," Transportation Research Record 2541, pp. 56–63, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  5. Koslowsky, M., Kluger, A.N., and Reich, M. (1995). Commuting Stress: Causes, Effects and Methods of Coping, Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, Germany. [ Return to Note 5 ]
  6. Kluger, A.N. (1998). "Commute Variability and Strain," Journal of Organizational Behavior, pp. 147–165. [ Return to Note 6 ]
  7. Federal Highway Administration. (2017). 2016 Urban Congestion Trends: Using Technology to Measure, Manage, and Improve Operations, Report No. FHWA-HOP-17-010, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop17010/fhwahop17010.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018.
  8. American Community Survey. (2014). "Table S0801: Commuting Characteristics by Sex," 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Available online: https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_14_1YR_S0801&prodType=table, last accessed August 24, 2018./li>
  9. Federal Highway Administration. (n.d). "Planning Glossary," (website) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/glossary/glossary_listing.cfm?TitleStart=R, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 9 ]
  10. Office of Operations. (2006). Travel Time Reliability: Making it There on Time, All the Time, Report No. FHWA-HOP-06-070, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/tt_reliability/brochure/ttr_brochure.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 10 ]
  11. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2013). Analytical Procedures for Determining the Impacts of Reliability Mitigation Strategies, SHRP2 Report No. S2-L03-RR-1, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 11 ]
  12. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (2013). Evaluating Alternative Operations Strategies to Improve Travel Time Reliability, SHRP2 Report No. S2-L11-RR-1, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 12 ]
  13. Transport Research Centre. (2009). Improving Reliability on Surface Transport Networks, International Transport Forum, Paris, France. Available online: https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/reliabilitysum.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 13 ]
  14. Eliasson, J. (2007). The Relationship Between Travel Time Variability and Road Congestion, in proceedings of the 2007 World Conference of Transport Research, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. [ Return to Note 14 ]
  15. Wright, B., Zou, Y., and Wang, Y. (2015). "Impact of Traffic Incidents on Reliability of Freeway Travel Times," Transportation Research Record 2484, pp. 90–98, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 15 ]
  16. Federal Highway Administration. (2014). 2013 Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions & Performance, Report to Congress, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2013cpr/pdfs/cp2013.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 16 ]
  17. Schrank, D., Eisele, B., Lomax, T., and Bak, J. (2015). 2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas & University System, College Station, TX. Available online: https://static.tti.tamu.edu/tti.tamu.edu/documents/mobility-scorecard-2015-wappx.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 17 ]
  18. Tsolakis, D., Tan, F., and Makwasha, T. (2011). Valuation of Travel Time Reliability: A Review of Current Practice, Report No. AP-R391/11, Austroads, Sydney, Australia. [ Return to Note 18 ]
  19. Haghani, A., Zhang, Y., and Hamedi, M. (2014). Impact of Data Source on Travel Time Reliability Assessment, Report No. UMD-2013-01, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Available online: http://www.mautc.psu.edu/docs/UMD-2013-01.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 19 ]
  20. Chien, S. and Liu, X. (2012). "An Investigation of Measurement for Travel Time Variability," Intelligent Transportation Systems, IntechOpen. Available online: http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/32778/InTech-An_investigation_of_measurement_for_travel_time_variability.pdf, last accessed August 24, 2018. [ Return to Note 20 ]
  21. Google Maps™. (2018). Routes I-295 and NJTP for common trip origin and destination. Generated via Google Maps™ online by Filmon Habtemichael. Available online: https://www.google.com/maps/@39.9518778,-75.5268748,9.75z. Generated July 30, 2018. [ Return to Note 21 ]
  22. Van Lint, J.W.C., Van Zuylen, H.J., and Tu, H. (2008). "Travel Time Unreliability on Freeways: Why Measures Based on Variance Tell Only Half the Story," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(1), pp. 258–277. [ Return to Note 22 ]
  23. U.S. Government Publishing Office. (2012). Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, Public Law 112 - 141, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-112publ141/content-detail.html, last accessed August 24, 2018. [ Return to Note 23 ]
  24. National Archives. (2017). "National Performance Management Measures; Assessing Performance of the National Highway System, Freight Movement on the Interstate System, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program," Federal Register, 82(11), pp. 5,970–6,052, National Archives, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/18/2017-00681/national-performance-management-measures-assessing-performance-of-the-national-highway-system, last accessed March 6, 2019. [ Return to Note 24 ]
  25. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (2017). Freight Facts and Figures 2017, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.bts.gov/sites/bts.dot.gov/files/docs/FFF_2017.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 25 ]
  26. Carrion, C. and Levinson, D. (2012). "Value of Travel Time Reliability: A Review of Current Evidence," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(4), pp. 720–741. [ Return to Note 26 ]
  27. Sadabadi, K.F., Jacobs, T.H., Erdogan, S., Ducca, F.W., and Zhang, L. (2015). Value of Travel Time Reliability in Transportation Decision Making: Proof of Concept—Maryland, SHRP2 Report No. S2-L35B-RW-1, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 27 ]
  28. Dowling, R., Parks, K., Nevers, B., Josselyn, J., and Gayle, S. (2015). Incorporating Travel-Time Reliability into the Congestion Management Process: A Primer, Report No. FHWA-HOP-14-034, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop14034/fhwahop14034.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 28 ]
  29. Gort, W., Österle, I., and Weiss, A. (2016). Forecasting and Valuing Travel Time Variability for Project Appraisal, Australian Transport Research Forum 2016 Proceedings, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  30. Kouwenhoven, M., de Jong, G.C., Koster, P., van den Berg, V.A., Verhoef, E.T., Bates, J., and Warffemius, P.M. (2014). "New Values of Time and Reliability in Passenger Transport in the Netherlands," Research in Transportation Economics, 47, pp. 37–49./li>
  31. Charlotte, C. and Hélène, L. (2017). "Empirical Illustration of Issues in Valuing Reliability Benefits of Transport Projects," Transportation Research Procedia, 26, pp. 166–176.
  32. Charlotte, C., Hélène, L., and Sandra, B. (2017). "Empirical Estimation of the Variability of Travel Time," Transportation Research Procedia, 25, pp. 2,769–2,783. [ Return to Note 32 ]
  33. Osterle, I., Gort, W., and Weiss, A. (2017). "Forecasting and Valuing Travel Time Variability for Cost-Benefit Analysis," Road & Transport Research: A Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice, 26(1), p. 21. [ Return to Note 33 ]
  34. Shams, K., Asgari, H., and Jin, X. (2017). "Valuation of Travel Time Reliability in Freight Transportation: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Stated Preference Studies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 102, pp. 228–243. [ Return to Note 34 ]
  35. Shams, K., Jin, X., Fitzgerald, R., Asgari, H., and Hossan, M.S. (2017). "Value of Reliability for Road Freight Transportation: Evidence from a Stated Preference Survey in Florida," Transportation Research Record 2610, pp. 35–43, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 35 ]
  36. He, X., Liu, H.X., and Cao, X.J. (2012). Estimating Value of Travel Time and Value of Reliability Using Dynamic Toll Data, Paper No. 12-2761, Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 36 ]
  37. Devarasetty, P.C., Burris, M., and Shaw, W.D. (2012). "The Value of Travel Time and Reliability- Evidence From a Stated Preference Survey and Actual Usage," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(8), pp. 1,227–1,240.
  38. Brent, D.A. and Gross, A. (2018). "Dynamic Road Pricing and the Value of Time and Reliability," Journal of Regional Science, 58(2), pp. 330–349. [ Return to Note 38 ]
  39. Kong, X., Eisele, W.L., Zhang, Y., and Cline, D.B. (2018). Evaluating the Impact of Real-Time Mobility and Travel Time Reliability Information on Truck Drivers' Routing Decisions, Presented at the 97th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 39 ]
  40. Circella, G., Tiedman, K., Handy, S., and Mokhtarian, P. (2016). Factors Affecting Passenger Travel Demand in the United States, National Center for Sustainable Transportation, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA. Available online: https://ncst.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/06-15-2016-NCST_White_Paper_US_Passenger_Travel_Final_February_2016_Caltrans3.pdf, last accessed August 29, 2018. [ Return to Note 40 ]
  41. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Vandervalk, A., Louch, H., Guerre, J., and Margiotta, R. (2014). Incorporating Reliability Performance Measures into the Transportation Planning and Programming Processes: Technical Reference, SHRP2 Report No. S2-L05-RR-3, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 41 ]
  42. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2013). Waterborne Freight Transportation: Bottom Line Report, Publication No. WFT-1, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. Available online: http://sp.water.transportation.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/WFT-1.pdf, last accessed October 31, 2018. [ Return to Note 42 ]
  43. Gayle, P.G. and Yimga, J.O. (2018). "How Much do Consumers Really Value Air Travel On-Time Performance, and to What Extent are Airlines Motivated to Improve Their On-Time Performance?," Economics of Transportation, 14, pp. 31–41. [ Return to Note 43 ]
  44. Office of Operations. (2011). 2010 Urban Congestion Trends: Enhancing System Reliability with Operations, Report No. FHWA-HOP-11-024, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop11024/fhwahop11024.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 44 ]
  45. Weisbrod, G. and Fitzroy, S. (2011). "Traffic Congestion Effects on Supply Chains: Accounting for Behavioral Elements in Planning and Economic Impact Models," Supply Chain Management—New Perspectives, IntechOpen. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/books/supply-chain-management-new-perspectives/traffic-congestion-effects-on-supply-chains-accounting-for-behavioral-elements-in-planning-and-econo, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 45 ]
  46. Konur, D. and Geunes, J. (2011). "Analysis of Traffic Congestion Costs in a Competitive Supply Chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(1), pp. 1–17. [ Return to Note 46 ]
  47. McKinnon, A., Edwards, J., Piecyk, M., and Palmer, A. (2009). "Traffic Congestion, Reliability, and Logistical Performance: A Multi-Sectoral Assessment," International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 12(5), pp. 331–345. [ Return to Note 47 ]
  48. Weisbrod, G. and Reno, A. (2009). Economic Impact of Public Transportation Investment, American Public Transportation Association, Washington, DC. Available online: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/docs/TCRPJ-11Task7-FR.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 48 ]
  49. Hartgen, D., Fields, G., Layzell, A., and San Jose, E. (2014). Employer Views on Traffic Congestion, Policy Brief 115, Reason Foundation, Los Angeles, CA. Available online: https://reason.org/wp-content/uploads/files/employer_views_traffic_congestion.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 49 ]
  50. Allen, B. (2010). "Traffic Congestion is Costing Minnesota Construction Firms $150 Million a Year, Survey Says," Minnpost Minneapolis, MN. Available online: https://www.minnpost.com/business/2010/06/traffic-congestion-costing-minnesota-construction-firms-150-million-year-survey-say, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 50 ]
  51. InfrastructureUSA. (2010). "Measuring the Impact of Highway Congestion on the Construction Industry," (website) InfrastructureUSA, New York, NY. Available online: https://www.infrastructureusa.org/agc-congestion-survey/, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 51 ]
  52. Uber. (2018). "How are fares calculated?" (website) Available online: https://help.uber.com/h/d2d43bbc-f4bb-4882-b8bb-4bd8acf03a9d, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 52 ]
  53. Zhang, K., Batterman, S., and Dion, F. (2011). "Vehicle Emissions in Congestion: Comparison of Work Zone, Rush Hour, and Free-Flow Conditions," Atmospheric Environment, 45(11), pp. 1,929–1,939. [ Return to Note 53 ]
  54. Joo, S., Oh, C., Lee, S., and Lee, G. (2017). "Assessing the Impact of Traffic Crashes on Near Freeway Air Quality," Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 57, pp. 64–73. [ Return to Note 54 ]
  55. Avetisyan, H.G., Miller-Hooks, E., Melanta, S., and Qi, B. (2014). "Effects of Vehicle Technologies, Traffic Volume Changes, Incidents, and Work Zones on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Production," Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 26, pp. 10–19. [ Return to Note 55 ]
  56. Levy, J.I., Buonocore, J.J., and Von Stackelberg, K. (2010). "Evaluation of the Public Health Impacts of Traffic Congestion: A Health Risk Assessment," Environmental Health, 9(1), p. 65. [ Return to Note 56 ]
  57. Dia, H. and Gondwe, W. (2008). Evaluation of Incident Impacts on Integrated Motorway and Arterial Networks Using Traffic Simulation, Submitted to the 29th Australian Transport Research Forum, Gold Coast, Australia. [ Return to Note 57 ]
  58. Gudden, J. (2014). Does the Predictability of the Commute Mediates the Relation of Commuting Mode On Stress?, Master's Thesis, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands. Available online: http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=135650, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 58 ]
  59. Costa, G., Pickup, L., and Di Martino, V. (1988). "Commuting—A Further Stress Factor for Working People: Evidence from the European Community II: An Empirical Study," International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Heath, 60, pp. 377–385. [ Return to Note 59 ]
  60. Evans, G.W., Wener, R.E., and Phillips, D. (2002). "The Morning Rush Hour: Predictability and Commuter Stress," Environment and Behavior, 34, pp. 521–530. [ Return to Note 60 ]
  61. Wener, R.E. and Evans, G.W. (2011). "Comparing Stress of Car and Train Commuters," Transportation Research Part F, 14(2), pp. 111–116. [ Return to Note 61 ]
  62. U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). "Average One-Way Commuting Time by Metropolitan Areas," (website) U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/interactive/travel-time.html, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 62 ]
  63. Higgins, C.D., Sweet, M.N., and Kanaroglou, P.S. (2017). "All Minutes are Not Equal: Travel Time and the Effects of Congestion on Commute Satisfaction in Canadian Cities," Transportation, pp. 1–20. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9766-2, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 63 ]
  64. Mulvany, L. (2014). "State to Spend $13.5 Million on Transit to Settle Zoo Interchange Suit," Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Milwaukee, WI. Available online: http://archive.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/state-to-spend-135-million-on-transit-to-settle-zoo-interchange-suit-b99273749z1-259843881.html/, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 64 ]
  65. Perk, V., Flynn, J., and Volinski, J. (2008). Transit Ridership, Reliability, and Retention, National Center for Transit Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL. [ Return to Note 65 ]
  66. Peng, Z., Yu, D., and Beimborn, E. (2002). "Transit User Perceptions of the Benefits of Automatic Vehicle Location," Transportation Research Record 1791, pp. 127–133, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 66 ]
  67. Carrel, A., Halvorsen, A., and Walker, J. (2013). "Passengers' Perception of and Behavioral Adaptation to Unreliability in Public Transportation," Transportation Research Record 2351, pp. 153–162, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 67 ]
  68. Diab, E.I., Badami, M.G., and El-Geneidy, A.M. (2015). "Bus Transit Service Reliability and Improvement Strategies: Integrating the Perspectives of Passengers and Transit Agencies in North America," Transport Reviews, 35(3), pp. 292–328. [ Return to Note 68 ]
  69. Shi, Q. and Abdel-Aty, M. (2016). "Evaluation of the Impact of Travel Time Reliability on Urban Expressway Traffic Safety," Transportation Research Record 2582, pp. 8–17, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 69 ]
  70. Office of Operations. (2004). TrafficIncident Management, Report No. FHWA-OP-04-052, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/aboutus/one_pagers/tim.htm, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 70 ]
  71. National Traffic Incident Management Coalition. (2004). Improving Traffic Incident Management Together, National Traffic Incident Management Coalition, Washington, DC. Available online: http://i95coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Flier_TIM_NTIMC.pdf?x70560, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 71 ]
  72. Karlaftis, M., Latoski, S., Richards, N., and Sinha, K. (1999). "ITS Impacts on Safety and Traffic Management: An Investigation of Secondary Crash Causes," Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal: Technology, Planning, and Operations, 5(1), pp. 39–52. [ Return to Note 72 ]
  73. Sullivan, J. (n.d.). TrafficIncident Management & Responder Safety, Emergency Responder Safety Institute, Hagerstown, MD. Available online: http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/content/uploads/sites/23/2016/05/PRE-012-1.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 73 ]
  74. Fahy, R. (2014). U.S. Firefighters Killed When Struck by Vehicles, 2000–2013, Fire Analysis and Research Division, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA. Available online: https://www.nfpa.org/~/media/files/news-and-research/fire-statistics/fire-service/osffstruckbyvenicles.pdf?la=en, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 74 ]
  75. Griffin, R. and McGwin, G. (2013). "Emergency Medical Service Providers' Experiences with Traffic Congestion," Journal of Emergency Medicine, 44(2), pp. 398–405. [ Return to Note 75 ]
  76. RapidSOS. (2015). Outcomes: Quantifying the Impact of Emergency Response Times, RapidSOS, New York, NY. Available online: https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/549701/Documents/RapidSOS_Outcomes_White_Paper_-_2015_4.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 76 ]
  77. Pell, J.P., Sirel, J.M., Marsden, A.K., Ford, I., and Cobbe, S.M. (2001). "Effect of Reducing Ambulance Response Times on Deaths from out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Cohort Study," BMJ, 322(7,299), pp. 1,385–1,388.
  78. Wilde, E.T. (2013). "Do Emergency Medical System Response Times Matter for Health Outcomes?," Health Economics, 22(7), pp. 790–806. [ Return to Note 78 ]
  79. Beland, L. and Brent, D. (2018). Traffic Congestion and the Performance of First Responders: Evidence from California Fire Departments, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA. Available online: https://www.lpbeland.com/uploads/7/8/7/5/7875420/trafficfires_.pdf, last accessed August 29, 2018. [ Return to Note 79 ]
  80. Berkeley, A.R. and Wallace, M. (2010). A Framework for Establishing Critical Infrastructure Resilience Goals: Final Report and Recommendations by the Council, National Infrastructure Advisory Council, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/niac/niac-a-framework-for-establishing-critical-infrastructure-resilience-goals-2010-10-19.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 80 ]
  81. HDR. (2009). Assessing the Full Costs of Congestion on Surface Transportation Systems and Reducing Them through Pricing, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/Costs%20of%20Surface%20Transportation%20Congestion.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 81 ]
  82. Federal Highway Administration. (2016). Implementation Highlights 2016: SHRP2 Solutions Tools for the Road Ahead, Report No. FHWA-OTS-17-002, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/goshrp2/Content/documents/2016SHRP2HighlightsReport_508.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 82 ]
  83. Minnesota Department of Transportation. (2017). SHRP2 Reliability Data & Analysis Tools: Round 4 Implementation Assistance in Minnesota Regional Workshop & Peer Exchange, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minneapolis, MN. [ Return to Note 83 ]
  84. Scriba, T. (2016). SHRP2 Reliability Implementation, FHWA SHRP2 and TSMO Workshop, Second Strategic Highway Research Program, Washington, DC. Available online: http://sp.stsmo.transportation.org/Documents/SHRP2Implementation.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 84 ]
  85. Federal Highway Administration. (2016). SHRP2 Reliability Lead Implementer Roundtable: Summary Report from January 2016 Workshop, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/goshrp2/Content/Documents/SHRP2ReliabilityWorkshop_Report_092616.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 85 ]
  86. Scriba, T., Jette, A., and Corbin, J. (2017). "Transportation Agencies Share SHRP2 Reliability Solutions: Success Stories for Advancing Operations," ITE Journal, 87(1), p. 45. [ Return to Note 86 ]
  87. Thesis, L., Ullman, G., and Moinet, A. (2016). Guide to Project Coordination for Minimizing Work Zone Mobility Impacts, Report No. FHWA-HOP-16-013, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 87 ]
  88. Office of Operations. (2004). Planned Special Events Traffic Management, Report No. FHWA-OP-04-046, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/aboutus/one_pagers/planned_events.htm, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 88 ]
  89. Federal Highway Administration. (2017). 2017 Road Weather Management Program Performance Measures Update, Report No. FHWA-HOP-17-054, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop17054/fhwahop17054.pdf, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 89 ]
  90. Office of Operations. (2014). "Active Transportation and Demand Management Approaches," (website), Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/atdm/approaches/index.htm, last accessed May 22, 2018. [ Return to Note 90 ]
  91. Shoup, D.C. (2006). "Cruising for Parking," Transport Policy, 13(6), 479–486. [ Return to Note 91 ]
  92. Weinberger, R., Millard-Ball, A., and Hampshire, R.C. (2017). Parking Search-Caused Congestion: Where's All the Fuss?, Paper No. 17-04407, Presented in the 97th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 92 ]
  93. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and PB Consultant. (2011). Guide to Integrating Business Processes to Improve Travel Time Reliability, SHRP2 Report No. S2-L01-RR-2, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 93 ]
  94. Office of Operations. (2017). "Welcome to Business Process Frameworks for Transportation Operations," (website) Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/tsmoframeworktool/index.htm, last accessed May 30, 2018. [ Return to Note 94 ]
  95. Tarnoff, P., Lockwood, S., O'Laughlin, J., and Thatchenkery, T. (2012). Institutional Architectures to Improve Systems Operations and Management, SHRP2 Report No. S2-L06-RR-1, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. [ Return to Note 95 ]
  96. Federal Highway Administration. (2012). Creating an Effective Program to Advance Transportation System Management and Operations: Primer, Report No. FHWA-HOP-12-003, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop12003/fhwahop12003.pdf, last accessed August 28, 2018. [ Return to Note 96 ]
  97. Burgess, L., Fowler, T., Minowitz, A., and Neudorff, L. (2016). Improving Business Processes for More Effective Transportation Systems Management and Operations, Report No. FHWA-HOP-16-018, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop16018/form.htm, last accessed May 2, 2019. [ Return to Note 97 ]
  98. Federal Highway Administration. (2012). Creating an Effective Program to Advance Transportation System Management and Operations Primer, Report No. FHWA-HOP-12-003, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop12003/index.htm, last accessed May 2, 2019. [ Return to Note 98 ]
  99. AASHTO. (n.d.) "Transportation Systems Management & Operations," (website), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. Available online: publications: http://www.aashtotsmoguidance.org, last accessed May 2, 2019. [ Return to Note 99 ]
  100. Adobe Stock. All photos (digital images). Available online: https://stock.adobe.com/images, last accessed June 28, 2019. Standard licenses. License terms available at: https://wwwimages2.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/legal/servicetou/Adobe_Stock_Additional_Terms_en_US_20190128_2200.pdf. [ Return to Note 100 ]
Office of Operations