Office of Operations Freight Management and Operations

Cross-town Improvement Project Evaluation

Foreword

Notice

This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names may appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document.

Quality Assurance Statement

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement.

Technical Report Documentation Page

1. Report No.

FHWA-HOP-12-013

2. Government Accession No.

3. Recipient’s Catalog No.

4. Title and Subtitle

Cross-town Improvement Project Evaluation

5. Report Date

February 17, 2012

6. Performing Organization Code

7. Author(s)

Roger Schiller, Mark Jensen, Alan Veile

8. Performing Organization Report No.

9. Performing Organization Name and Address

Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
100 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 400
Cambridge, MA 02140

10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS)

11. Contract or Grant No.

DTFH61-06-D-00004

12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address

U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Freight Management and Operations
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

13. Type of Report and Period Covered

Final Report
December 2009-February 2012

14. Sponsoring Agency Code

15. Supplementary Notes

FHWA COTR: Randy Butler, Office of Freight Management and Operations

16. Abstract

This report summarizes the findings of an independent evaluation of the FHWA Cross-town Improvement Project (C-TIP), which was deployed in Kansas City and Chicago in various periods from October 2010 through September 2011. The Dynamic Route Guidance (DRG) and Real-Time Traffic Monitoring (RTTM) components of C-TIP achieved measurable dray truck travel time savings and emissions reductions in operational tests. Separate deployments of in-cab smart phones running the C-TIP Open Source Architecture Package with drayage companies in Kansas City and Chicago achieved measurable reductions in bobtails even as revenue loads grew or remained stable. Simulations of the Intermodal Move Exchange (IMEX) component of C-TIP revealed the potential to reduce bobtails through better information sharing between cross-town railroads and drayage firms.

There were some operational constraints to full utilization of C-TIP in Kansas City. Changing railroad business practices, along with a generally low level of economic activity during the test, contributed to a lack of railroad participation in the program. More broadly, the test experience suggests that the intermodal industry probably lacks the collaborative mentality to make a cooperative dispatch platform work. Nonetheless, this initial deployment of C-TIP technologies did prove the concept that such applications can provide public and private sector benefits including congestion mitigation, emissions reductions, and truck travel time savings. The results suggest that future research may be best targeted towards freight information exchange, improving the truck dispatch operation, and in providing real-time information and tools to support truck routing decisions.

17. Key Words

Dynamic Route Guidance, drayage optimization, freight technology, freight emissions, intelligent transportation systems, evaluation

18. Distribution Statement

No restrictions.

19. Security Classif. (of this report)

Unclassified

20. Security Classif.
(of this page)

Unclassified

21. No of Pages

101

22. Price

N/A

Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72)                                                                       Reproduction of completed pages authorized

Metric Conversion Factors
(International System of Units)

APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS
SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL
LENGTH
in inches 25.4 millimeters mm
ft feet 0.305 meters m
yd yards 0.914 meters m
mi miles 1.61 kilometers km
AREA
in2 square inches 645.2 square millimeters mm2
ft2 square feet 0.093 square meters m2
yd2 square yard 0.836 square meters m2
ac acres 0.405 hectares ha
mi2 square miles 2.59 square kilometers km2
VOLUME
fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL
gal gallons 3.785 liters L
ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3
yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3
NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3
MASS
oz ounces 28.35 grams g
lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg
T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 megagrams (or "metric ton") Mg (or"t")
TEMPERATURE (exact degrees)
oF Fahrenheit 5 (F-32)/9 or (F-32)/1.8 Celsius oC
ILLUMINATION
fc foot-candles 10.76 lux lx
fl foot-Lamberts 3.426 candela/m2 cd/m2
FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS
lbf poundforce 4.45 newtons N
lbf/in2 poundforce per square inch 6.89 kilopascals kPa

 

APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS FROM SI UNITS
SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL
LENGTH
mm millimeters 0.039 inches in
m meters 3.28 feet ft
m meters 1.09 yards yd
km kilometers

0.621

miles mi
AREA
mm2 square millimeters

0.0016

square inches in2
m2 square meters 10.764 square feet ft2
m2 square meters

1.195

square yards yd2
ha hectares

2.47

acres ac
km2 square kilometers

0.386

square miles mi2
VOLUME
mL milliliters 0.034 fluid ounces fl oz
L liters 0.264 gallons gal
m3 cubic meters 35.314 cubic feet ft3
m3 cubic meters 1.307 cubic yards yd3
MASS
g grams 0.035 ounces oz
kg kilograms 2.202 pounds lb
Mg(or "t") megagrams (or "metric ton") 1.103 short tons (2000 lb) T
TEMPERATURE (exact degrees)
oC Celsius 1.8C+32 Fahrenheit oF
ILLUMINATION
lx lux 0.0929 foot-candles fc
cd/m2 candela/m2 0.2919 foot-Lamberts fl
FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS
N newtons 0.225 poundforce lbf
kPa kilopascals 0.145 poundforce per square inch lbf/in2

previous | next