Office of Operations
21st Century Operations Using 21st Century Technologies
Table of Contents

Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume XII:
Work Zone Traffic Analysis – Applications and Decision Framework

References

  1. Hardy, M., and K. Wunderlich. Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume VIII: Work Zone Modeling and Simulation – A Guide for Decision-Makers. Publication FHWA-HOP-08-029, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., August 2008.
  2. Hardy, M., and K. Wunderlich. Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume IX: Work Zone Modeling and Simulation – A Guide for Analysts. Publication FHWA-HOP-09-001, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., March 2009.
  3. Work Zone Safety and Mobility. Maryland State Highway Administration (MD SHA), Maryland. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  4. Traffic Mitigation Guidelines for Work Zone Safety and Mobility. New Jersey Department of Transportation, New Jersey, October 2007. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  5. Ullman, G.L., and T.J. Lomax. A Primer on Work Zone Safety and Mobility Performance Measurement. Publication FHWA-HOP-11-033, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., September 2011.
  6. Sankar, P., K. Jeannotte, J.P. Arch, M. Romero, and J.E. Bryden. Work Zone Impacts Assessment – An Approach to Assess and Manage Work Zone Safety and Mobility Impacts of Road Projects. Publication FHWA-HOP-05-068, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006.
  7. Jeannotte, K., A. Chandra, V. Alexiadis, A. Skabardonis. Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume II: Decision Support Methodology for Selecting Traffic Analysis Tools. Publication FHWA-HRT-04-039, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., June 2004.
  8. Alexiadis, V., K. Jeannotte, and A. Chandra. Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume I: Traffic Analysis Tools Primer. Publication FHWA-HRT-04-038, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., June 2004.
  9. Mitretek Systems. QuickZone Case Studies: The Application of QuickZone in Eight Common Construction Projects. Publication FHWA-HOP-09-054, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., October 2004.
  10. Schroeder, B.J., and N. Rouphail. Estimating the Operational Impacts of Freeway Work Zones on Extended Facilities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2169, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pages 70-80.
  11. Bhajandas, A, J. Mallela, and P. Littleton. Reconstruction of Eastern Avenue Bridge Over Kenilworth Avenue in Washington, D.C. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, August 2011. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  12. Zhang, M. Managing Construction Work Zone Traffic with NetZone. Caltrans Research Connection Presentation, April 2007. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  13. Zou, N., K. Nguyen, and J. Schoen. DTA Application: I-10 Corridor Study. Tucson, Arizona, June 2010.
  14. Schrock, D., and T. Maze. Evaluation of Rural Interstate Work Zone Traffic Management Plans in Iowa Using Simulation. Proceedings of the Mid-Continent Transportation Symposium, Iowa State University, Ames, 2000.
  15. Work Zone Analysis Guide. Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA), Maryland, September 2008. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  16. Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010). Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2011.
  17. Weng, J., and Q. Meng. A Decision Tree-Based Model for Work Zone Capacity Estimation. The 90th TRB Annual Meeting, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., January 2011.
  18. WSDOT Work Zone Safety and Mobility (in Design Manual). Washington State Department of Transportation, December 2009.
  19. Al-Kaisy, A., M. Zhou, and F. Hall. New Insights into Freeway Capacity at Work Zones: Empirical Case Study. In Transportation Research Record 1710, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pages 154-160.
  20. Al-Kaisy, A., and F. Hall. Examination of Effect of Driver Population at Freeway Reconstruction Zones. In Transportation Research Record 1776,Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pages 35-42.
  21. Kim, T., D.J. Lovell, and J. Paracha. A New Methodology to Estimate Capacity for Freeway Work Zones. The 80th TRB Annual Meeting, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Paper No. 01-0566, January 2001.
  22. Horowitz, A. Microsimulation of Freeway Work Zones to Assess Flow and Capacity. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2009.
  23. Horowitz, A.J., I. Weisser, and T. Notbohm. Diversion from a Rural Work Zone Owing to a Traffic-Responsive Variable Message Signage System. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  24. Luttrell, T., M. Robinson, J. Rephlo, R. Haas, J. Srour, R. Benekohal, J. Oh, and T. Scriba. Comparative Analysis Report: The Benefits of Using Intelligent Transportation Systems in Work Zones. Publication FHWA-HOP-09-002, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., October 2008.
  25. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Guidance on the Level of Effort Required to Conduct Traffic Analysis Using Microsimulation. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2012.
  26. Rouphail, N., B. Schroeder, and B. Eads. HCM2010 Chapter 10 Freeway Facilities User’s Guide to FREEVAL2010. February 2011.
  27. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., and Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Model Validation and Reasonableness Checking Manual. Travel Model Improvement Program, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., February 1997. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  28. A Primer for Dynamic Traffic Assignment. ADB30 Transportation Network Modeling Committee, Transportation Research Board, 2010.
  29. Dowling, R., A. Skabardonis, and V. Alexiadis. Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume III: Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Software. Publication FHWA-HRT-04-040, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., June 2004.
  30. Rummel, R.J. Applied Factor Analysis. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois, 1970.
  31. DeCoster, J. Overview of Factor Analysis. August 1998. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  32. Hair, J.F., W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E., Anderson, and R.L. Tatham. Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2006.
  33. Hatcher, L. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute Press, 1994.
  34. DiStefano, C., M. Zhu, and D. Mindrila. Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation,Volume 14, No. 20, 2009.
  35. Upayokin, A. Multi-Criteria Assessment for Supporting Freeway Operations and Management Systems. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas Arlington, 2008.
  36. Work Zone Road User Costs – Concepts and Applications. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA-HOP-12-005, December 2011.
  37. System Metrics Group, Inc., and Cambridge Systematics, Inc. California Life-Cycle Benefit/Cost Analysis Model (Cal-B/C) User’s Guide (Version 4.0). California Department of Transportation, February 2009.
  38. Karim, A., and H. Adeli. CBR Model for Freeway Work Zone Traffic Management. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Volume 129, No. 2, March/April 2003, pages 134-145.
  39. Carson, J.L., S.D. Anderson, and G.L. Ullman. Matrix-Based Decision Support Tools for Construction Activities on High-Volume Roads. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2081, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pages 9-28.
  40. Dowling, R. Guide on the Consistent Application of Traffic Analysis Tools and Methods. Publication FHWA-HRT-11-064, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., November 2011.
  41. Dowling, R. Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume VI: Definition, Interpretation, and Calculation of Traffic Analysis Tools Measures of Effectiveness. Publication FHWA-HOP-08-054, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., January 2007.
  42. The University of Florida Transportation Research Center and T-Concepts Corporation, 2009. Determination of HCM-Compatible Performance Measures from Vehicle Trajectory Analysis. NCHRP Report 3-85-20, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2009.
  43. Dowling, R. Development of Highway Capacity Manual Methodologies To Assess Advanced Traffic Management Strategies That Influence Traffic Demand. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2011.
  44. Zhang, M., W. Shen, Y. Nie, and J. Ma. Integrated Construction Zone Traffic Management. California PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-2008-9, 2008. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  45. Chatterjee, I., P. Edara, S. Menneni, and C. Sun. Replication of Work Zone Capacity Values in a Simulation Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2130, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2009, pages 138-148.
  46. Tang, Y., and S. Chien. Optimization of Work Zone Schedule Considering Time-Varying Traffic Diversion. The 89th TRB Annual Meeting, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Paper No. 10-0184, January 2010.
  47. Lee, E., and D. Thomas. Accelerated Reconstruction of I-15 Devore Corridor. Public Roads, Volume 70, No. 4, 2007.
  48. Ullman, G.L., M.D. Finley, J.E. Bryden, R. Srinivasan, and F.M. Council. Traffic Safety Evaluation of Nighttime and Daytime Work Zones. NCHRP Report 627, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
  49. Mahoney, K.M. et al. Design of Construction Work Zones on High-Speed Highways. NCHRP Report 581, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., October 2006.
  50. The Quadro Manual Part 2: The Valuation of Costs in Quadro. July 2004. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  51. Highway Work Zone Analysis. Wisconsin Transportation Economic Analysis Guidelines. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  52. Gettman, D., and L. Head. Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models. The 82nd TRB Annual Meeting, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., January 2003.
  53. Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM). Publication FHWA-HRT-08-049, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., May 2008.
  54. Sun, D., and R. Benekohal. Analysis of Car Following Characteristics for Estimating Work Zone Safety. The 83rd TRB Annual Meeting, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Paper No. 04-4883, January 2004.
  55. Li, Y., and Y. Bai. Development of Crash-Severity-Index Models Based on Work Zone Crash Severity Analyses. The 87th TRB Annual Meeting, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., January 2008.
  56. Torday, A., and A. Dumont. Safety Indicator for Microsimulation-Based Assessments. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Laboratory of Traffic Facilities, LAVOC-EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2002.
  57. Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA). Traffic Trends System Report. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  58. Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA). Highway Location Reference. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  59. Pesti, G., C. Chu, K. Balke, X. Zeng, J. Shelton, and N. Chaudhary. Regional Impact of Roadway Construction on Traffic and Border Crossing Operations in the El Paso Region. Texas Transportation Institute, October 2010.
  60. Chang, G.L., and N. Zou. An Integrated Work-Zone Computer System for Capacity Estimation, Cost/Benefit Analysis, and Design of Control. Maryland State Highway Administration, Project No. SP708B4B, Maryland, December 2009.
  61. Schroeder, B., N. Rouphail, S. Sajjadi, and T. Fowler. Corridor-Based Forecasts of Work-Zone Impacts for Freeways. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Research and Analysis Group, Final Report Project 2010-08, 2011.
  62. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Benefit/Cost Analysis of the Temporary Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) for the Reconstruction of I-496. Lansing, Michigan, November 2001.
  63. Kell, J.H., and I.J. Fullerton. Manual of Traffic Signal Design, 2nd Edition. Institute of Traffic Engineers, January 1998.
  64. Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010), Volume 4: Applications Guide. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  65. Bugess & Nipple, Inc. The Cleveland Innerbelt Project. Ohio Department of Transportation, 2004.
  66. Ohio Department of Transportation. Traffic Management in Work Zones: Interstate and Other Freeways. Accessed January 11, 2012.
  67. Kremer, P.F., A.W. Kotchi, A.J. DeJohn, and K.B. Winslow. The Use of Operational Models to Evaluate Construction Staging Plans, A Case Study. Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., 2001.

PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®.

Office of Operations