Office of Operations
21st Century Operations Using 21st Century Technologies

Efficient Use of Highway Capacity Summary
Report to Congress

Bibliography

1. Mirshahi, M., et al. Active Traffic Management: The Next Step in Congestion Management. Alexandria, VA: American Trade Initiatives, 2007. FHWA-PL-07-012.

2. Research and Innovative Technology Administration. Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. [Online] Federal Highway Administration, 1991. http://ntl.bts.gov/DOCS/istea.html.

3. Federal Highway Administration/Federal Transit Administration. A Guide to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Under ISTEA: How the Pieces Fit Together. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1995. FHWA-PD-95-031.

4. Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program. The Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process: Key Issues. Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration/Federal Transit Administration, 2004. FHWA-EP-03-041.

5. Task Force for Public Transportation Facilities Design of the AASHTO Subcommittee on Design. Guide for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Facilities. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2004. ISBN # 1-56051-295-4.

6. Schrank, D. and Lomax, T. The 2005 Urban Mobility Report. College Station, TX : Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 2005.

7. Federal Highway Administration. Fiscal Year 2003 Performance Plan. [Online] September 2002. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/2003plan/index.htm#natneed6.

8. —. Congestion Mitigation. [Online] U.S. Department of Transportation. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/congestionmitigation/congestionmitigation.htm.

9. Collier, T. and Goodin, G. Managed Lanes: A Cross-Cutting Study. College Station, TX : Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 2004. FHWA-OP-05-037.

10. FHWA Freeway Management Program, Office of Operations. Managed Lanes Initiative. [Online] U.S. Department of Transportation. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freewaymgmt/managed_lanes.htm.

11. Transportation Research Board Joint Subcommittee on Active Traffic Management – AHB20(5). Definition of ATM. s.l.: Unpublished Committee Document, 2009.

12. BBC News World Edition. Creative ways to beat congestion. [Online] November 2004. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4044803.stm.

13. TLemke, K. and Irzik, M. Temporary Use of Hard Shoulders-Experiences and Economic Assessment. Bergisch Gladbach, Germany: Federal Highway Research Institute, Traffic Planning, Highway Design, and Safety Analyses Section, June 2006. Original photos courtesy of Autobahndirektion Sudbayern (South Bavaria). Presentation to Planning for Congestion Management Scan Team.

14. Helleman, B. Hard Shoulder Running (HSR) in The Netherlands. AVV Transport Research Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Ministry of Transport, Public Works, and Water Management, Directorate-General of Public Workds and Water Management, June 2006. Presentation to Planning for Congestion Management Scan Team.

15. Differt, D., et al. Managing Travel Demand: Applying European Perspectives to U.S. Practice. Alexandria, VA: American Trade Initiatives, 2006. FHWA-PL-06-015.

16. Bolte, F. Transport Policy Objectives: Traffic Management as Suitable Tool. Bergisch Gladback, Germany: Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt), June 2006. Presentation to Planning for Congestion Management Scan Team.

17. Martin, P. Bus Use of Shoulders. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board, 2006. TCRP Synthesis 64.

18. Kuhn, B. Personal Interview with Mn/DOT Staff, Mn/DOT Metro District. 2009.

19. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. 4th Edition. Washington, D.C.: AASHTO, 2004.

20. Urbanik, T. and Bonilla, C. R. California Experience with Inside Shoulder Removals. Transportation Research Record 1122. 1987.

21. McCasland, W. R. Use of Freeway Shoulders to Increase Capacity. Transportation Research Record 666. 1978.

22. I-95 Express Website. [Online] Florida Department of Transportation. http://www.95express.com.

23. Kuhn, B. Personal Interview with MassDOT Staff. 2009.

24. —. Personal Interview with Mn/DOT Staff, Regional Transportation Management Center. 2009.

25. —. Personal Interview with VDOT Staff. 2009.

26. —. Personal Interview with WSDOT Staff. [Online] October 2009.

27. Mn/DOT Urban Partnership Agreement Website. [Online] Minnesota Department of Transportation. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/upa/managed.html.

28. Hessen Road and Traffic Authority. Traffic Control Hessen, Hessen Road and Traffic Authority. Weisbaden, Germany: s.n., 2006.

29. Tignor, S., et al. Innovative Traffic Control Technology and Practice in Europe. Alexandria, VA: American Trade Initiatives, 1999. FHWA-PL-00-021.

30. Active Traffic Management. [Online] Highways Agency. http://www.highways.gov.uk/knowledge/1361.aspx.

31. Federal Highway Administration. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.

32. Curren, J. E.. Use of Shoulders and Narrow Lanes to Increase Freeway Capacity. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board, 1995. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 369.

33. Lee, J. T., Dittberner, R. and Sripathi, H. Safety Impacts of Freeway Managed-Lane Strategy: Inside Lane for High-Occupancy Vehicle Use and Right Shoulder Lane as Travel Lane During Peak Periods Transportation Research Record 2012. 2007.

34. Sultan, B., Meekums, R. and Brown, M. The Impact of Active Traffic Management on Motorway Operation. Manchester, UK: Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2008.

35. Bauer, K. M., et al. Safety Effects of Narrow Lanes and Shoulder-Use Lanes to Increase Capacity of Urban Freeways Transportation Research Record 1897. 2004.

36. Middelham, F. Dynamic Traffic Management. AVV Transport Research Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Ministry of Transport, Public Works, and Water Management, Directorate–General of Public Works and Water Management, June 2006. Presentation to Planning for Congestion Management Scan Team.

37. Wormgoor, F. The Netherlands Director–General for Public Works and Water Management. AVV Transport Research Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Rikswaterstaat, June 2006. Presentation to Planning for Congestion Management Scan Team.

38. Koot, A. Operational Aspects of Traffic Information. AVV Transport Research Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Ministry of Transport, Public Works, and Water Management, Directorate–General of Public Works and Water Management, June 2006. Presentation to Planning for Congestion Management Scan Team.

39. Taale, H. Regional Traffic Management Method and Tool. AVV Transport Research Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Ministry of Transport, Public Works, and Water Management, Directorate–General of Public Works and Water Management, June 2006. Presentation to Planning for Congestion Management Scan Team.

40. Sparmann, J. Freeway Operation in Germany: Experiences in Hessen. Athens, Greece: Hessian Ministry of Economy and Transport, June 2006. Presentation to 1st International Symposium on Freeway and Tollway Operations.

41. Pilz, A. Presentation of the Traffic Centre Hessen. Frankfurt, Germany: Jessian Ministry of Economy and Transport, June 2006. Presentation to Planning for Congestion Management Scan Team.

42. Grant, D. M42 Active Traffic Management Pilot Project. London, England: Highwas Agency, Department for Transport, June 2006. Presentation to Planning for Congestion Management Team.

43. Highways Agency, Department for Transport. Active Traffic Management (ATM) Project M42 Junctions 3A-7. [Online] http://www.highways.gov.uk/knowledge/1359.aspx.

44. —. M25 Controlled Motorways Summary Report, Issue 1. London, England: Highways Agency, Department for Transport, 2004.

45. Department for Transport. About DfT. [Online] http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_about/documents/divisionhomepage/031259.hscp.

46. Tailor, P. Journey Time Reliability and Network Monitoring. London, England: Highways Agency, Department for Transport, June 2006. Presentation to Planning to Congestion Management Scan Team.

47. Highways Agency, Department for Transport. M42 Active Traffic Management Results — First Six Months. London, England: Highways Agency, Department for Transport, 2007.

48. —. 4-Lane Variable Mandatory Speed Limits - 12 Month Report. London England: Highways Agency, Department for Transport, 2008.

49. 12th International HOV Systems Conference: Improving Mobility and Accessibility with Managed Lanes, Pricing, and BRT. Federal Highway Administration. Houston, TX: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1995. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/12hovsysconf/.

50. Ungemah, D., Kuhn, B. Special Use of Shoulders for Managed Lanes: Review of Practice and Research. Texas Transportation Institute. College Station, TX: s.n., 2009. Technical Report for Mn/DOT.

51. Virginia Department of Transportation. I-66 Multimodal Transportation and Environmental Study. Fairfax, VA: Virginia Department of Transportation, 2003.

52. Schintler, L. ITS Center Project: I-66 Integration Model. Arlington, VA: Virginia Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Partners in Motion Evaluation Subcommittee, 2001. http://www.gmupolicy.net/its/papers3/66/paper-Schintler-I-66.htm.

53. Virginia Department of Transportation. I-66 Spot Improvements Citizen Information Meeting. Fairfax, VA: Virginia Department of Transportation, 2007. http://www.virginiadot.org/info/resources/I-66_Spot_Improvements-CIM-9-26_2007.pdf.

54. —. High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Systems: Wehn and Where. Fairfax, VA: Virginia Department of Transportation, 2009. http://www.virginiadot.org/travel/hov-novasched.asp.

55. Swires, M., et al. US 2 - Hard Shoulder Running Case STudy. Washington State Department of Transportation. Vancouver, WA : s.n., 1009. Presentation.

56. Virigina Department of Transportation. 2007 Traffic Data. Fairfax, VA Virginia Department of Transportation, 2007. http://www.virginiadot.org/info/ct-TrafficCounts-2007.asp.

Office of Operations