This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names may appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document.
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement.
1. Report No. FHWA-HOP-10-004 |
2. Government Accession No. |
3. Recipient’s Catalog No. |
||||
4. Title and Subtitle Applying Analysis Tools in Planning for Operations: Case Study #3 – Using Archived Data As a Tool for Operations Planning |
5. Report Date September 2009 |
|||||
| 6. Performing Organization Code | ||||||
7. Author(s) Lin Zhang and Krista Jeannotte, Cambridge Systematics |
8. Performing Organization Report No. |
|||||
9. Performing Organization Name and Address Cambridge Systematics, Inc. |
10. Work Unit No. |
|||||
11. Contract or Grant No. DTFH61-05-C-00036 |
||||||
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Department of Transportation |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered |
|||||
14. Sponsoring Agency Code
|
||||||
15. Supplementary Notes FHWA COTR: Wayne Berman, Office of Operations; John Halkias, Office of Operations; and Richard Backlund, Office of Operations |
||||||
16. Abstract More and more, transportation system operators are seeing the benefits of strengthening links between planning and operations. A critical element in improving transportation decision-making and the effectiveness of transportation systems related to operations and planning is through the use of analysis tools and methods. This brochure is one in a series of five intended to improve the way existing analysis tools are used to advance operational strategies in the planning process. The specific objective of developing this informational brochure series was to provide reference and resource materials that will help planners and operations professionals to use existing transportation planning and operations analysis tools and methods in a more systematic way to better analyze, evaluate, and report the benefits of needed investments in transportation operations. This particular case study focused on the application of archived data as a tool for operations planning. This case study summarizes an effort involving the use of archived data for operations planning conducted for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) in the San Francisco Bay Area. |
||||||
17. Key Words analysis tools, planning for operations, archived data, performance measures |
18. Distribution Statement
|
|||||
19. Security Classif. (of this report) Unclassified |
20. Security Classif. Unclassified |
21. No of Pages 27 |
22. Price na |
|||
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed pages authorized
| APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYMBOL | WHEN YOU KNOW | MULTIPLY BY | TO FIND | SYMBOL |
| LENGTH |
||||
| in |
inches | 25.4 | millimeters | mm |
| ft |
feet | 0.305 | meters | m |
| yd |
yards | 0.914 | meters | m |
| mi |
miles | 1.61 | kilometers | km |
| AREA |
||||
| in2 |
square inches | 645.2 | square millimeters | mm2 |
| ft2 |
square feet | 0.093 | square meters | m2 |
| yd2 |
square yard | 0.836 | square meters | m2 |
| ac |
acres | 0.405 | hectares | ha |
| mi2 |
square miles | 2.59 | square kilometers | km2 |
| VOLUME |
||||
| fl oz |
fluid ounces | 29.57 | milliliters | mL |
| gal |
gallons | 3.785 | liters | L |
| ft3 |
cubic feet | 0.028 | cubic meters | m3 |
| yd3 |
cubic yards | 0.765 | cubic meters | m3 |
NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 |
||||
| MASS |
||||
| oz |
ounces | 28.35 | grams | g |
| lb |
pounds | 0.454 | kilograms | kg |
| T |
short tons (2000 lb) | 0.907 | megagrams (or "metric ton") | Mg (or "t") |
| TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) | ||||
| oF |
Fahrenheit | 5 (F-32)/9 |
Celsius | oC |
| ILLUMINATION |
||||
| fc |
foot-candles | 10.76 | lux | lx |
| fl |
foot-Lamberts | 3.426 | candela/m2 | cd/m2 |
| FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS |
||||
| lbf |
poundforce | 4.45 | newtons | N |
| lbf/in2 |
poundforce per square inch | 6.89 | kilopascals | kPa |
| APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS FROM SI UNITS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYMBOL | WHEN YOU KNOW | MULTIPLY BY | TO FIND | SYMBOL |
| LENGTH |
||||
| mm |
millimeters | 0.039 |
inches | in |
| m |
meters | 3.28 |
feet | ft |
| m |
meters | 1.09 |
yards | yd |
| km |
kilometers | 0.621 |
miles | mi |
| AREA |
||||
| mm2 |
square millimeters | 0.0016 |
square inches | in2 |
| m2 |
square meters | 10.764 |
square feet | ft2 |
| m2 |
square meters | 1.195 |
square yards | yd2 |
| ha |
hectares | 2.47 |
acres | ac |
| km2 |
square kilometers | 0.386 |
square miles | mi2 |
| VOLUME |
||||
| mL |
milliliters | 0.034 |
fluid ounces | fl oz |
| L |
liters | 0.264 |
gallons | gal |
| m3 |
cubic meters | 35.314 |
cubic feet | ft3 |
| m3 |
cubic meters | 1.307 |
cubic yards | yd3 |
| MASS |
||||
| g |
grams | 0.035 |
ounces | oz |
| kg |
kilograms | 2.202 |
pounds | lb |
| Mg (or "t") |
megagrams (or "metric ton") | 1.103 |
short tons (2000 lb) | T |
TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) |
||||
| oC |
Celsius | 1.8C+32 | Fahrenheit | oF |
| ILLUMINATION |
||||
| lx |
lux | 0.0929 |
foot-candles | fc |
| cd/m2 |
candela/m2 | 0.2919 |
foot-Lamberts | fl |
| FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS |
||||
| N |
newtons | 0.225 | poundforce | lbf |
| kPa |
kilopascals | 0.145 |
poundforce per square inch | lbf/in2 |