Work Zone Mobility and Safety Program

Applying the Principles of the Work Zone Safety and Mobility Rule to Design-Build Projects: Two Case Studies

Technical Report Documentation Page

1. Report No.

FHWA-HOP-13-024

2. Government Accession No.


3. Recipient's Catalog No.


4. Title and Subtitle

Applying the Principles of the Work Zone Safety and Mobility Rule to Design-Build Projects: Two Case Studies

5. Report Date

March 2013

6. Performing Organization Code

7. Author(s)

Erik Seiberlich, Ming-Shiun Lee, Gary Thompson, John Crawford, Tracy Scriba

8. Performing Organization Report No.

9. Performing Organization Name and Address

URS
100 S. 5th Street, Suite 1500
Minneapolis, MN 55402

10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS)

11. Contract or Grant No.

DTFH61-06-D-00007/TO BA07087

12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address

U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Operations
1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.
Washington, DC 20590

13. Type of Report and Period Covered

14. Sponsoring Agency Code

FHWA

15. Supplementary Notes

Project Leader: Tracy Scriba, FHWA
Project performed under subcontract to Battelle for the FHWA Office of Operations

16. Abstract

The Work Zone Safety and Mobility Rule (the Rule), published in 2004, aims to bring about greater consideration and understanding of work zone impacts throughout project development; minimization of those impacts where possible through scheduling, coordination, design, and staging decisions; and better management of remaining impacts during construction. While the principles advocated by the Rule apply to design-build projects, they may need to be applied somewhat differently to address the differences in process between design-build and traditional design-bid-build processes. This case study report describes how the good work zone planning, design, and management principles of the Rule were applied to two design-build projects, the US 285 Design-Build Project in Colorado and the I-85 Corridor Improvement Project in North Carolina, and how application of these principles differed from traditional design-bid-build projects. Lessons learned from the two case studies and other research will be used to identify tips, guidance, and other resources that may be helpful to agencies and design-builders to facilitate application of the principles of the Rule to design-build projects.

17. Key Words

Work Zone, Safety, Mobility, Design-Build, Case Study

18. Distribution Statement

No limitations.

19. Security Classification (of this report)

Unclassified

20. Security Classification (of this page)

Unclassified

21. No of Pages

59

22. Price

N/A

Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72)
Reproduction of completed page authorized.


previous | next
Office of Operations