Appendix H
Questionnaire Response from TANN [14]
John Cox
May 30, 2002
PRIVATE ACTORS
Questions for individual interviews
Questions in blue: See questionnaires in: Battele/ US
DoT. 2002. Sharing data for public information. Washington
(http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/Travel/DatShare.htm)
A - factual information
What is your business model regarding ownership and
sharing of real time and archived TTI data?
User fees, Revenue Sharing
How do you protect the value of your TTI data?
Use agreements and the honor system.
In the locations where you receive data from public
agencies, what type of data do you receive typically, only sometimes or never.
|
Electronic/digital |
Verbal |
Video |
|
Typically |
Sometime |
Never |
Typically |
Sometime |
Never |
Typically |
Sometime |
Never |
| Motorway/ real-time |
X |
| |
| | |
X |
| |
Motorway/ static |
X |
| |
| | |
X |
| |
Public transport/ real-time |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Public transport/ static |
| | |
| | |
| | |
When you receive data with public agencies, are there
conditions that they place on accessing data?
Technical specifications (e.g. hardware or
software required) In some cases,
in most cases it is conditions we place on them
deliver the data to an FTP site.
Restriction on use (e.g. depiction of injury
or identity on video images) - No
Acknowledgement of the source (e.g., use of
logo, verbal mention) - No
Any other conditions? - No
Which, if any, of the following arrangements regarding
cost of data sharing apply in the locations in which you operate? Please
indicate if these arrangements are typical, occasional, or never apply.
You reimburse an agency for its costs to
provide data - Never
You pay for your own hardware,
communications, or software costs for accessing the data
No, not the data source site.
You are required to share a portion of the
revenue generated from your business - No
You make in-kind contributions (e.g. sharing
part of a communications fiber) - No
You make "value added" information
available to the agency for internal use - No
Any other forms? (specify) - No
What distribution channels are used to deliver traveler
information to the public? Desktop and PDA
Internet Web Sites; In-vehicle displays; Cell phones; Kiosks; Pagers.
What TTI information is made available to the public?
Traffic congestion, incidents, alert messages,
cameras, weather information.
What other information are made available?
What are the characteristics of the TTI service(s) your institution
participates in regarding:
Service accessibility? -
Internet, cell phone access.
User profile?
Commuters.
How many users do(es) the service(s) have per day?
150,000 a month.
How did the number of users develop since the introduction of
the service? Steady growth over 4 years.
B assessment and opinion
What are key components of value-added TTI service provision:
In terms of service contents?
Graphic displays, text to voice
In terms of technologies?
XML data format
What are success criteria for the development of value-added TTI services:
In terms of context? (market size, geography, infrastructures,
socio-economic structure, cultural differences)
Highly congested traffic corridors
In terms of markets and demand? (user expectations and
acceptance, willingness to pay, cost/benefit)
Highly congested traffic corridors
In terms of technologies? (data sources, data exchange, data
quality and reliability, end-user devices)
24/7 real time data access
In your opinion, either based on your own experience or observing that
of other firm's, is the practice of revenue sharing in return for receiving
public agency data a successful approach? Why or why not?
No. There is not sufficient revenue to share.
Public/Private business agreements generally dont work... public agencies do
not take risks or operate for profit. The private sector makes huge investments
in the delivery of the information which is not recognized by the public
agencies even though these investments have significant value to the public
sector. Presently private sector investments are a losing proposition and the
public sector is not willing to share in these losses.
What do you think are workable arrangements for
public-private cooperation in TTI service provision?
If the public sector finds value in get traveller
information into the hands of the consumer, then the public sector needs to make
an all out effort to insure that large volumes of data gets into the hands of
the private sector with great convenience and reliability.
In what do these arrangements differ?
?
What do you think are the principal driving forces of TTI service deployment:
At the institutional level?
A passion to get information into the hands
of the consumer.
At the technological level?
Data collection coverage, access and
broadband and wireless delivery.
What do you think are the principal obstacles for TTI service deployment:
At the institutional level?
Lack of interest, desire or motivation.
At the technological level?
Data gaps which includes coverage, access
and reliable delivery of data.
In your opinion, what are crucial measures for enhancement and promotion of
TTI service provision:
At the institutional level? -
Lack of interest, desire or motivation.
At the technological level?
Data gaps which includes coverage, access and
reliable delivery of data.
What do you think should be the features of an enabling policy framework for
TTI service deployment?
An
interest, desire, motivation and passion to get information into the hands of
the consumer.
Filling data gaps
including coverage, access and reliable delivery of data.
What do you think are the deficits of the the Commission
Recommendation in respect of these requirements?
??? - Too much time and energy is wasted on
the wrong issues. Filling data gaps including coverage, access and the reliable
delivery of free data to the private sector is the name of the game.
C additional questions related to business models
Regarding changes in your business model:
If you have more than one phase in your business model (or
business plan), what are the phases and which phase are you in now?
The beginning. The market is yet to develop.
What important deviations, if any, have taken place between
your actual record, future plans and your original business plan, and for what
reasons? Deviations take place
everyday. No one is smart enough to predict how a brand new market is going to
operate a year from now. Changes in technology, extensive delays in gaining
access to data and slow market development forces continuous changes to the
business plan. What hasnt changed is the five year forecast. We are still 5
years away from a real market. We said the same thing 4 years ago.
Regarding lessons learned from your business experience:
What are some of the unexpected results, both positive and
negative, that you have experienced in your business development?
The lack of data access. We expected more
cooperation from the public sector. We thought traveller information was
something the public sector wanted to happen. While there is strong support in
some circles, the amount of public agency support is very limited.
Base on what you know today, how would you have done things
differently? Probably nothing. I
wouldnt know 4 years ago what I know today. And today is not much different
than 4 years ago. There are still no large quantities of reliable data or very
many markets that have data and it is still very difficult to predict when there
will be reliable data. There is no large user market and it is still very
difficult to predict when there will be a market. The same decision remains
today. Do we have the staying power to wait for data and a market to develop or
do we wait until the data is available before we enter the traveller information
market.
Final Note: Traveler Information is not nor ever
will be a self sustaining stand alone business. It is product within a portfolio
of products that is operated by a service company. It will only be reasonably
successful in a critical mass - economy of scale environment.
Notes / References:
14. - Questions are in regular font;
answers are in italic.
Return to ATIS Practices in
Europe and North America Report