Skip navigation to main content
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration FHWA HomeFeedback

Task 1

This initial task is intended to develop a generic organizational framework that can be used to categorize operations assets. The framework is based on a study of current operations units to identify possible characteristics and organizational sub-unit designations, and consideration for the support of 21 st century transportation operations.

Prior to studying the current activities of the various public agency operations units, it is important to have an accepted understanding of what operations is. While there is not generally a clear, professionally-recognized definition, one dictionary-based definition below is taken from Encarta:

Operations - controlling of organized activities:   the supervising, monitoring, and coordinating of the activities of a military or civilian organization or a complex machine. (Encarta definition)

Considering the application of transportation operations, the previous definition is revised accordingly as follows:

Transportation Operations - controlling of organized activities:   the supervising, monitoring, and coordination of activities of a transportation network.

In 1999, as the profession was gaining awareness of operations, Dr. Christine M. Johnson said at the 69 th ITE Annual Meeting: “…we have expanded our core mission, for the first time, to include a mission of operating the system – actively managing its performance – safely and efficiently....(and that) operating a system almost inherently means process – the integration of actions, systems, users, etc….”.

So what activities are managing this integration of actions, systems, users, etc.? Which activities within transportation agencies are considered “Operations”? It is noted that Transportation Operations has characteristics that are performance-oriented for the customer, consider human factors as opposed to straight functional requirements, affects safety and mobility, and is continuous on a 24/7 basis. This varies from capacity expansion activities that are mainly function-based.

Review of Pavement and Bridge Asset Management Systems

Asset management has been slowly increasing in stature within the transportation community as a way to manage transportation assets. In its current state, asset management has consisted primarily of the management of infrastructure assets, specifically pavements and bridges. Pavement and bridge management systems represent the first level of asset management. Each of these systems assists asset owners in evaluating specific assets, identifying deficiencies, and helping prioritize improvements.

Pavement Management Systems (PMS) have been around since the early 1960’s, tracing their early history back to the AASHO Road Tests of the late 50’s and early 60’s. Over time, all states have instituted some sort of PMS and assigned the maintenance of such a system to various branches of their DOT. The most common units within a DOT to maintain PMS include those associated with materials, design, construction and maintenance. The states that have put PMS under their materials units tend to have a more research-oriented outlook on pavement management. Other DOT’s may be more oriented toward future repair and rehabilitation needs within the state.

Bridge Management Systems (BMS) is a much newer system used by the State DOT’s. BMS has only been around for the last 20 years or so, with many of the states deploying BM as a result of initiatives occurring as a result of the ISTEA legislation during the 1990’s. Due to expertise required for the system, it is generally managed by the structures or bridge units within the State DOTs.

Review of Current Operations Units

An outreach to several state and local transportation agencies that are somewhat more advanced in the deployment of 21 st century technologies was performed for this review, in addition to literature research. While transportation is a multi-modal issue, and the operations focus is becoming more multi-modal, this study basically focuses on “Roadway-Based Operations”, while recognizing there are multi-modal considerations in the process. The agencies that were reviewed include the following:

City of Anaheim, California Arizona Department of Transportation
City of APortland, Oregon California Department of Transportation
City of Tallahassee, Florida Illinois Department of Transportation
Salt Lake City, Utah Nebraska Department of Roads
Harris County, Texas Virginia Department of Transportation
Los Angeles County, California Washington State Department of Transportation
Montgomery County, Maryland Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Illinois State Toll Highway Authority

Local agencies usually place Roadway-Based Operations units in a public works department, while others are situated in traffic engineering departments, transportation departments, engineering departments, or others. Roadway-Based Operations units can be found in various designated functional units in State agencies, including: operations, engineering, traffic engineering, maintenance, and others, often spread across multiple units mostly in regional district organizations rather than the headquarters.

Proposed Generic Organizational Framework

A list of operations activities that may be performed by an agency unit was developed based on the research, then put into an organizational framework. It is believed no single agency has all of the units identified below. In many cases, actual agency units may perform more than one of the unit functions noted below. Considerable interaction and coordination is generally required across the units. Figure 1 below represents a generic organizational framework that will support the identification and categorization of roadway-based operations assets. The framework is followed by brief descriptions and explanations of the categorization breakdown by generic operational section and unit.

Generic Organizational Framework for Roadway-based operations assets chart

Click to see larger view

Traffic Engineering - Associated with the planning, monitoring, geometric design and traffic operations of roads, streets, motorways, their networks, and their relationships with other modes of transportation for the safe, efficient and convenient movement of persons and goods (definition from ITE). This section is fairly traditional with a long history of experience within transportation agencies and the industry. Decisions may require extensive analysis before deploying changes to the transportation network.

Regulations – This unit helps develop new and revised traffic laws and ordinances - i.e. speed limits, no passing zones, and prohibitions of specific movements.

Use of Traffic Control Devices – This unit is responsible for the applications of traffic control devices, following the guidelines of the MUTCD. It may include sub-units for each class of traffic control applications:

Parking– This unit addresses the provision and operation of parking, both on street, off-street. Responsibilities may include: zoning studies, access considerations, design, and for some agencies operations (i.e. meters, lots).

Lighting – This unit addresses highway lighting to satisfy the needs of drivers and pedestrians. Responsibilities include: warrants analysis, design of light source luminaire and placement, maintaining uniformity over a system. Lighting is usually implemented as part of a capital project, but can be modified in an operations process. Lighting maintenance is placed under Operations Maintenance.

Traffic Management – Is the utilization of personnel (traffic operations and enforcement), materials, and equipment along freeways, city streets, and rural highways to achieve safe and efficient movement of people, services and goods” (ITE Traffic Engineering Handbook). This section is more instantaneous and dynamic than Traffic Engineering, as it addresses the various types of congestion-causing incidents. Decisions are frequently made in “real-time”.

Traffic Management Centers (TMC)– This unit addresses all the functions directly related to the activities that take place in a TMC. Because of the varied skills required, it may be divided into several sub-units, identified below:

Arterial Signal Systems – This unit addresses signalized intersection controllers interconnected to a central computerized system. The real-time operations of these systems is generally addressed in the TMC, however, other significant efforts are required for the operations of these systems. There are two sub-units identified which support this function:

Incident Management – This unit addresses all activities related to incident management outside of the TMC. The diverse range of activities is represented by the following sub-units:

Moveable Bridges– This unit specifically addresses the operations of moveable bridges.

Tunnels – This unit specifically addresses the operations of tunnels.

Independent Units may include the following:

Toll Payment Collection – This unit addresses the operations of toll collection facilities. Although common with toll highway agencies, some state and local agencies have such facilities, and more are emerging through the implementation of managed lane facilities. It is also noted that many agencies consider Toll Payment and Processing as a separate entity on par with, or more important than, Traffic Engineering or Operations Planning.

Planning for Operations – This separate unit may be placed in a planning section that plans for capital and operational projects. Responsibilities include: architectures, long range plans, systems planning process, modeling/analysis, concepts of operations, performance measurements/evaluations.

Operations Project Management– This separate unit may be found in a capital design/construction or project management section that addresses capital and operational projects. Responsibilities include: system requirements, design plans, specifications, procurements, inspections, as-builts, and acceptance tests.

Operations Oriented Maintenance– This separate unit is usually placed in a Maintenance section, but impacts operations by providing maintenance support for operational assets. Examples include maintenance of: sign fabrication, removal, replacement, installation; signal hardware installation and maintenance (may not include cabinet equipment); pavement markings installation and maintenance; and roadway lighting.

ResearchThis separate unit may be found in various parts of an organization. Responsibilities include those supporting operations based activities.

CVO/Freight Management– This separate unit is usually found in planning sections or on its own. Responsibilities include: CVISN; safety monitoring; credentialing; enforcement; emissions testing (DMV activities); supply chain management (i.e. FIRST program in New York).

Border control– This section is not common to all state and local transportation agencies, but certainly impacts operations. Responsibilities may include international visitors and goods, or other inspection services (i.e. California and Arizona agriculture departments).

Security Activities – This section addressed security functions that have more recently emerged in level of importance.

Multi-modal/Inter-modal Operations – This section addresses multi-modal and inter-modal activities that can impact roadway operations. These units may fall outside the jurisdiction of a DOT, but require inter-agency coordination. Possible sub-units include:

Regional/Multi-agency Coalitions– Though usually not a specific unit within an agency, this is a growing activity due to the emergence of integrated ITS systems, information sharing and coordination of activities, incident management, signal systems (i.e. TRANSCOM, Gary-Chicago-Milwaukee Corridor).

Table of Contents | List of Tables | List of Figures | Top of Section | Previous Section | Next Section | HOME


FHWA Home | U.S. DOT | Operations Home | Privacy Policy
FHWA
Federal Highway Administration - United States Department of Transportation