Chapter Six. Traffic Management
Plan
Page 2 of 9
Plan Components
Overview
Managing travel for planned special events involves developing a transportation
management plan that contains operations and service strategies specific
to managing traffic, transit, and travel demand. A transportation management
plan consists of three key components:
- Traffic management plan
- Transit plan
- Travel demand management initiatives
A transportation management plan represents an extension of the feasibility
study, referencing study input data and analysis conclusions, then expanding
the analysis to include mitigation strategies and tactics. These strategies
create a physical change in travel pattern flow, and tactics describe
available tools or management approaches to meet the associated strategy.
The feasibility study results influence the scope of the transit plan
and other travel demand management initiatives by identifying traffic
capacity deficiencies and community (e.g., residential and commercial
business) impacts. Transit agencies may work off-line to develop a transit
plan detailing schedules and necessary equipment and personnel resources.
The transit plan may specify one of more categories of transit operation
that include:
- Existing service plus additional vehicle hours (e.g., more frequent
service or expanded hours of operation)
- Existing service plus route deviation (e.g., includes new stop at
transit station(s) near venue)
- Express service (e.g., new route and schedule)
- Charter service (e.g., contract service)
Numerous factors affect the category and extent of service provided.
Public transit agencies must consider service boundaries and Federal Transit
Administration regulations, particularly with regard to charter service.
Profitability and resource availability, particularly if the planned special
event occurs during a commute or high-recreational traffic period, governs
decision-making as well. A traffic management plan incorporates the transit
plan by accommodating proposed services and/or mitigating service deficiencies.
It also promotes special travel demand management strategies, such as
designating parking in preferred locations for high occupancy vehicles
only.
A traffic management plan includes operations strategies for managing
event-generated and background traffic within the local and regional area
impacted. The plan also specifies techniques to facilitate site access,
parking, and pedestrian access. Table 6-1 lists objectives of a planned
special event traffic management plan. Pedestrian accommodation involves
handling pedestrians arriving to a planned special event venue via all
available modes of travel. To ensure the dissemination of credible traveler
information, the event planning team should include media representatives
and partnerships developed if necessary. The traffic management plan should
include mechanisms for dissemination of accurate and up-to-date information.
The plan should state expected transportation conditions, categorized
by mode of travel (e.g., expected travel time by car, transit, express/charter
service, etc.), with congestion mitigation measures. Safety provisions
include prevention of secondary traffic incidents, reduced driver confusion,
and reduced vehicular and pedestrian conflicts.
Table 6-1. Traffic Management Plan Objectives
Objective |
- Facilitate safe and quick travel to/from the event site for
spectators and participants.
- Utilize excess transportation system capacity.
- Maximize efficiency of parking operations and internal circulation.
- Accommodate pedestrians.
- Automate traffic control tasks.
- Disseminate useful and credible traveler information.
- Maximize safety.
- Minimize impact on affected residents and businesses.
|
As shown in Table 6-2, the key components of a traffic management plan
for planned special events include:
- Site access and parking plan
- Pedestrian access plan
- Traffic flow plan
- Traffic control plan
- En-route traveler information plan
- Traffic surveillance plan
- Traffic incident management and safety plan
Table 6-2. Traffic Management Plan
Components
Component |
Consideration |
Site Access and Parking Plan |
- Lot assignment
- Vehicle access and circulation
- Parking area ingress
- Pick-ups and drop-offs
- Parking area egress
- Parking area design and operation
- Process component
- Park component
- Parking occupancy monitoring
- Parking regulations
- Traveler information
|
Traffic Flow Plan |
- Route planning
- Corridor traffic flow route
- Local traffic flow route
- Alternate routes
- Emergency access routes
- Background traffic accommodation
- Transit accommodation
|
En-route Traveler Information Plan |
- Static signing
- Changeable message signs
- Highway advisory radio
- Media
- Other technology applications
|
Traffic Incident Management and Safety Plan |
- Crash prevention
- Signing
- Public information safety campaign
- Service patrols
- Traffic incident quick clearance initiatives
|
Pedestrian Access Plan |
- Pedestrian control
- Pedestrian routing
- Pedestrian crossing
- Disabled accessibility
- Shuttle bus service
- Service design
- Station design
- Management
- Cost
|
Traffic Control Plan |
- Freeway traffic control
- Traveler information
- Interchange operations
- Street traffic control
- Alternative lane operations
- Route marker signing
- Monitoring
- Intersection traffic control
- Turning movement lane balance
- Traffic signal operations
|
Traffic Surveillance Plan |
- Closed-circuit television systems
- Field observation
- Aerial observation
- Media reports
|
Not all plan components represent a distinct formal plan but warrant
consideration, either individually or in concert with another component.
For instance, a traffic incident management (TIM) plan may reference an
existing TIM manual for a region but include new operations details (e.g.,
freeway service patrol routes and quick clearance strategies) specific
to the planned special event.
The event planning team in-charge of developing the traffic management
plan also should consider the number and operating characteristics of
traffic management team command centers to be used on the day-of-event.
Figure 6-2 shows three command center arrangements for traffic management
team operations on the day-of-event. Stakeholders may utilize one to all
command center types during the day-of-event. The tactical approach presented
in the traffic management plan depends on what command centers are planned.
A transportation management center (TMC) allows for the automation of
several traffic surveillance and control tasks. Agencies dispatching a
mobile command post on the day-of-event may take responsibility of developing
a traffic management plan for the road system segment within their jurisdiction.
In turn, the agency: (1) coordinates critical elements of the plan (e.g.,
freeway to street connections) with other pertinent stakeholders during
event planning team meetings, (2) formally distributes the plan during
the implementation activities phase, and (3) staffs a supervisor at an
interagency command post on the day-of-event. Therefore, for a single
planned special event, the traffic management plan may include one plan
developed by an interagency event planning team or a series of plans specific
to each affected jurisdiction or each transportation system component
(e.g., freeways, streets and intersections, and venue site).
Figure 6-2. Traffic Management Team Command Centers
on the Day-of-Event D
Development Process and Integration
The following principles steer the traffic management plan development
process: (1) provide a satisfactory level of service to all transportation
system users, and (2) achieve balanced transportation system operations.
Figure 6-3 illustrates the fundamental relationships in transportation
system operations that drive the consideration and evaluation of mitigation
measures throughout this process. Characteristics of demand include volume,
route of travel, and mode of travel. Transportation system characteristics
include:
- Existing infrastructure (e.g., number of travel lanes, parallel roadways,
etc.)
- Operational policies and regulations (e.g., scheduled transit service,
traffic signal control, etc.)
- Monetary costs (e.g., parking fees, tolls, etc.)
Figure 6-3. Fundamental
Relationships in Transportation System Operations
In Chapter 5, the feasibility study evaluated the flow pattern created
by the transportation system and demand (relationship #1). The traffic
management plan development process begins with an assessment of this
flow pattern. First, practitioners should recognize that flow pattern
influences travel choice and, therefore, demand (relationship #2) as long
as other attractive (e.g., higher utility) travel alternatives exist.
For instance, a feasibility study may identify a roadway capacity deficiency,
but an effective traveler information plan can alleviate the deficiency
by informing transportation system users of other, underutilized travel
alternatives (e.g., alternate routes or modes). This effort achieves balanced
transportation system operations by equalizing the utility of all available
travel choices and may succeed in providing a satisfactory level of service
for all system users.
Flow pattern also influences the transportation system (relationship
#3), causing planners to implement capacity improvements or changes in
transportation system operations. Simple changes include establishing
temporary regulations or revising monetary charges (recouped from event
organizers) to influence travel choice utility. Other infrastructure and
operations mitigation measures required to manage travel for a planned
special event are developed by the event planning team and specified in
the traffic management plan. Such measures, when analyzed or implemented,
cause a flow pattern change.
The most cost-effective and preferred set of strategies for planned special
event travel management utilizes the existing transportation system infrastructure
and services. This represents the recommended initial focus of the event
planning team; Achieve balanced transportation system operations, then
evaluate system level of service.
Planned Special Event Activity Networks
Figure 6-4 outlines the various activity networks that may serve a planned
special event venue. Each activity network describes the inter-modal movements
and transfer points from origin to venue destination. Integration of the
traffic management plan components involves meeting the service requirements
of these activity networks. For example:
- A pedestrian access plan must accommodate pedestrian trips connecting
various modes of travel.
- A courtesy shuttle bus operation may service both public transit stations
and satellite parking areas within the venue site area.
- Traveler information plans must account for all activity networks.
- Impacts to non-attendee transportation system users occur on the regional
level, and activity network components within the site area level impact
local residents and businesses near the venue.
Figure 6-4. Planned Special Event
Activity Networks D
For smaller planned special events, the event planning team may target
one activity network, such as improving automobile access to designated
parking areas or improving public transit usage. For larger events, the
team must coordinate and achieve seamless operation among several activity
networks.
Special Considerations
The event planning team must create a flexible traffic management plan
that accommodates modifications on the day-of-the-event as well as special
considerations that surface prior to the planned special event.
Table 6-3 lists the various groups that either attend or have a direct
interest in a planned special event. Throughout the traffic management
plan development process, the event planning team must regularly monitor
and communicate any special considerations that arise in conjunction with
the needs of the groups attending the event.
Table 6-3. Groups Attending a Planned
Special Event
Group |
- Participants
- Spectators
- Event sponsor
- Dignitaries
- Media
- Non-ticketed visitors
- Street vendors
|
Dignitaries
Ensuring the security of dignitaries traveling to and from an event venue
requires added traffic control measures and constant surveillance while
a motorcade is in motion. This includes the implementation of a rolling
roadblock as the motorcade traverses a planned route in addition to the
use of aerial surveillance for monitoring motorcade progress and downstream
traffic conditions. In fact, the transport of dignitaries represents a
planned special event in itself, regardless of travel purpose. Dignitaries
may not announce a visit until the last minute, well after the event planning
team finalizes the event traffic management plan. Also, non-security personnel,
including transportation agency officials, may not receive information
on the actual dignitary arrival time or motorcade travel route until a
short time before the motorcade commences travel. In turn, the event planning
team must maintain special provisions within the traffic management plan,
such as alternate road closures based on motorcade route, to allow a motorcade
unimpeded access to its destination.
Event Participants
Event participants not only require secure transport, but maintaining
their travel itinerary is of critical importance. In particular, regional/multi-venue
events may require event participant transport while ingress/egress operations
take place at adjacent planned special event venues. Here, stakeholders
may elect to outfit vehicles used to transport participants with an Automatic
Vehicle Location (AVL) system. The traffic management team can continually
monitor the exact location of vehicles transporting participants and other
VIPs from a TMC or command post and implement special traffic control
(e.g., change traffic signals to a green indication) as needed.
Media
Media often arrives to a planned special event well before spectators
and marks one of the last groups to depart the event. However, media crews
may conduct broadcasts outside the event venue. Coverage of a street use
event involves special accommodations as well. The event planning team
should coordinate with media groups on where: (1) media trucks will park,
(2) cameras positioned, and (3) cables run.
Street Vendors
Under normal day-to-day traffic operations, side friction generally
refers to the frequency of parking maneuvers and transit stops occurring
in and out of travel lanes. Street vendor activities during planned special
events, shown for example in Figure 6-5, impede traffic flow as event
patrons slow or stop to conduct transactions (e.g., buy event tickets
or merchandise). Motorist safety becomes a concern when street vendors
traverse the right-of-way of freeways and arterial roads. Elements of
a traffic incident management and safety plan should include tactics for
eliminating illegal street vendor activities.
Figure 6-5. Street
Vendor Activity
Contingency Planning
Contingency planning represents event insurance. While stakeholders
may consume additional time and resources during advance planning for
a planned special event, the availability of contingency plans helps mitigate
a potential systemic breakdown of the transportation system during an
unexpected event occurring at or near the same time as the planned special
event. Key steps in contingency planning include:
- Develop a traffic management plan that is scenario-based.
This concept applies to various plan components as well as to pertinent
tactics. Each developed plan should include response actions for different
unplanned scenarios. Plans and tactics may consider identical and different
scenarios. A response action under one plan may warrant implementation
of a contingency response described in another plan. For example, heavy
rains that force the closure of a parking area triggers traveler information
message changes to an alternate planned set.
- Consider and plan for a range of possible unplanned scenarios. Table
6-4 provides a contingency plan checklist for planned special events.
This checklist includes the risk scenarios presented in the previous
chapter. An emergency management agency may maintain a separate emergency
response plan that, if put into effect, supercedes the traffic management
plan. Yet, the emergency management agency and other public safety agencies
work as part of the event planning team to ensure adequate emergency
access routes, pedestrian access routes, and evacuation destination
areas exist to meet emergency management plan requirements.
- Determine changes in operation due to unplanned scenarios. Aside from
evacuation, the occurrence of a major traffic incident or security threat
creates a multi-faceted problem for a traffic management team. This
includes potential reallocation of personnel, from field crews to supervisors
who must manage the unexpected event, and equipment resources. In addition,
intra- and interagency radio communications may become deficient in
servicing the unplanned event and planned special event if agencies
failed to assign a dedicated channel for planned special event only
communications.
Table 6-4. Contingency Plan Checklist
Contingency |
- Weather
- Severe weather outbreak
- Flooding on event site access routes
- Flooding in event parking areas
- Parking during wet weather
- Security threat
- Major traffic incident
- Delayed event
- Event cancellation
- Absence of trained personnel and volunteers on the day-of-event
- Equipment breakdown
- Demonstration or protest
- Unruly spectator behavior
- Overcrowding
- Event patron violence
|
Consider the level of response to a security threat, involving a suspicious
truck stopped on a freeway, that occurred during the 2002 Winter Olympics:(1)
Early in the Games, a semi-trailer truck was stopped on the I-15
freeway, just south of downtown Salt Lake City. Because the truck did
not have the legally required markings and other reasons, the Utah Highway
Patrol (UHP) considered the situation to be a potential safety threat.
Additional law-enforcement resources were summoned to the scene. During
the entire time, the staff in transportation management center Room 230
(regional transportation management stakeholders) monitored the situation
closely, viewing it with a nearby CCTV camera as well as monitoring radio
reports from the UHP officers at the scene. After almost an hour passed
without a resolution, staff in Room 125 (senior Utah DOT traffic engineers)
began preparing to invoke the contingency plan for closing the freeway
in both directions. This Action Set would have diverted all freeway traffic
to parallel arterials, with the appropriate traffic management actions
(new signal timing on the surface streets, changeable message sign messages
on the freeway), plus traveler information actions (issuing a CommuterLink
Alert, media bulletin, etc.). Fortunately, it was soon determined that
the cargo in the truck was benign and the "issue" was closed
in Room 230.
|