Evaluation Methods and Techniques: Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Program
Appendix A: Evaluation Plan Checklist
This checklist is designed to assist ATCMTD grantees in developing their Evaluation Plans. Example templates that grantees can include in their Evaluation Plans are also provided. The templates are a tool for summarizing key evaluation-related information at a high level; the Evaluation Plans should include more detailed descriptions of measures, methods, and procedures.
If you have any questions about the checklist, please contact Margaret Petrella (Social Scientist, The Volpe Center) at Margaret.Petrella@dot.gov.
Evaluation Plan Topic |
Project Overview
- Describe the project and highlight the technologies being deployed
- List the project stakeholders (project team, partners, evaluation team) and describe roles and responsibilities, particularly with respect to completing the evaluation
- Summarize what constitutes end-of-project successes
- Provide a deployment and evaluation schedule in terms of months and years; include project milestones
|
Evaluation Goals/Objectives and Evaluation Questions1 (see Table 20 below)
- Describe project evaluation goals and/or objectives and associated evaluation questions
- Develop at least one evaluation question for each goal or objective; multiple specific, evaluation questions are better than a few general ones
|
Performance Measures (PMs) (see Table 21 below)
- Identify one or more performance measure(s) for each evaluation question
- Ensure (describe how) you are meeting the performance measures prescribed in the FAST Act
- Develop system performance measures that measure whether the technology is functioning as intended (i.e. to verify the functionality of the technology)
- Ensure (describe how) your PMs are measurable within the scope of the evaluation. If targets are described, ensure they are appropriate
- Think about the unit of analysis (metric) needed for your analysis
- Describe the data sources for each PM (include existing data sources as well as primary data collection). If your agency is uncertain about the data sources or elements, indicate what data you would need to measure the PMs and note that updates to the plan will include more details on “X”
|
Evaluation Methodology (see Table 21 below)
-
Describe the method(s) that will be used to address each evaluation question (likely a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods)
- Describe the experimental design, as appropriate (before-after; treatment-control)
- Describe potential confounding factors
- Ensure the evaluation design enables the measurement of the proposed PMs; identify the specific data elements that are required
- Describe any limitations or risks associated with the method or the data elements
- If multiple technologies are deployed, be clear how the different technologies will be evaluated
|
Data Collection Procedures and Data Management
-
Describe how the data will be collected, including any plans for a pilot
- For example, for surveys, plan should include: general method of recruitment; sample size; potential survey topics
- For field studies, plan should include: location, data collection frequency, data collection period
- Address data management (e.g., data logging and transmission to the evaluation team (if applicable); data storage; data access and privacy protection; data fusion (if applicable), data quality checks, etc.) [note: for existing systems, less detail may be needed]
|
Table 20: Example TEMPLATE for Evaluation Goals, Objectives, and Evaluation Questions
Goal Area |
Objective |
Evaluation Questions |
Improve Safety |
Reduce Traffic crashes |
To what extent has Connected Vehicle (CV) application X reduced traffic crashes along corridor X? |
What proportion of drivers using CV application X rated the safety warnings as helpful? |
Reduce Congestion/Improve Mobility |
Improve travel times |
What impact did adaptive signal control have on travel times along corridor Y? |
Improve Effectiveness of Real-Time Integrated Transportation Information |
Provide the public with access to real-time integrated traffic, transit, and multimodal transportation information to make more informed travel decisions |
Did a majority of application users indicate that the travel time information helped improve their commute decision making? |
Cost Savings and Improved Return on Investment |
Provide cost savings to transportation agencies |
What was the benefit-cost ratio of the adaptive signal control deployment? |
Share Institutional Insights |
Lesson Learned |
What lessons learned did project managers identify to facilitate future successful deployments of CV? |
[ADD] |
[ADD] |
[ADD] |
Note: Examples are included for illustrative purposes only. Additionally, there may be multiple performance measures per Evaluation question.
Table 21: Example TEMPLATE for Evaluation Performance Measures and Methodology
Evaluation Questions/Hypotheses |
Performance Measure |
Information Source/Method |
Data Element |
Limitations/Constraints |
What proportion of drivers using CV application X rated the safety warnings as helpful? |
% of respondents who feel safety warning was helpful |
Survey |
Survey response in post-survey |
- Low response rate may be an issue
|
What impact did adaptive signal control have on travel times along corridor Y? |
% change in average travel times |
Field test (vehicle probe data) |
Pre-post comparison of vehicle probe data |
- Weather, incidents may affect measurement
|
What lessons learned did project managers identify to facilitate future successful deployments of CV? |
Lessons Learned |
Interviews |
Responses to questions about lessons learned |
- Findings for one project may not generalize to other locations
|
What was the benefit cost ratio of the adaptive signal control deployment? |
Net present value |
Benefit-cost analysis |
Monetized estimates of project impacts |
- Incomplete data
- Some impacts are difficult to quantify
|
[ADD] |
[ADD] |
[ADD] |
[ADD] |
|
Note: Examples are included for illustrative purposes only. Additionally, there may be multiple performance measures per Evaluation question.