Office of Operations
21st Century Operations Using 21st Century Technologies


2. Plans and Practices

The evacuation transportation management plans and practices of each agency/region were compared against a list of desirable elements using “Harvey Ball” ratings.

2.1 Harvey Ball System

The Harvey Ball rating system was used to indicate the degree to which each element in a list of desirable elements has been implemented or considered by each agency. It should be noted that the determination of ratings was somewhat subjective, but the purpose of the analysis was to compile the ratings for all agencies in order to make qualitative observations of trends.

Table 2-1: Harvey Ball System

N/A

Not Addressed in Interview

Harvey 0

Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice

Harvey 1

Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented

Harvey 2

Minimally Implemented

Harvey 3

Moderately Implemented

Harvey 4

Fully Implemented

 

Table 2-2 shows the Harvey Ball ratings for each agency that participated in the questionnaire along with the corresponding list of desirable elements. This list of desirable elements consists of 16 specific plans and practices considered essential to developing a well-rounded emergency evacuation plan. Table 2-3 shows the list next to a number that corresponds to the question from the survey that addresses that particular key element.

Table 2-2: Survey Results
    Integration of transportation into general emergency plans Tailoring of plans to address all types of evacuation and special event scenarios Use of modeling tools to estimate capacity needs and availability Pre-established evacuation routes and traffic control practices Use of transit services and resources, including for special needs evacuees Use of ITS components Appropriate role of transportation agencies in resource and materials management and coordination, including resource staging Use of an incident command system (ICS), and integration of transportation into the system Coordination between TMCs, transit agencies, and EOCs Coordination among other agencies Procedures for identifying and delegating management activities Protocols for communications between agencies Protocols for communications with evacuees Appropriate testing/training practices Incorporation of lessons learned in exercises and evacuation into plans and practices Incorporation of lessons learned in exercises and evacuations into future training
Charleston, SC South Carolina DOT Fully Implemented Minimally Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented N/A Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Minimally Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented
South Carolina Emergency Management Division Moderately Implemented Moderately Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented Moderately Implemented N/A Moderately Implemented Moderately Implemented Moderately Implemented Minimally Implemented Minimally Implemented
Jacksonville, FL City of Jacksonville Department Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice N/A N/A Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Moderately Implemented Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented Moderately Implemented N/A Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice N/A Minimally Implemented Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented
Florida DOT Fully Implemented Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented Moderately Implemented Fully Implemented N/A Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented N/A Moderately Implemented N/A N/A Moderately Implemented Moderately Implemented N/A N/A
Jacksonville Port Authority Did not participate in surveyClick to go to next row                              
Phoenix, AZ Arizona DOT Did not participate in surveyClick to go to next row                              
Maricopa County DOT Moderately Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Minimally Implemented N/A N/A Minimally Implemented N/A Fully Implemented N/A Minimally Implemented N/A Minimally Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Minimally Implemented Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented
Valley Metro Did not participate in surveyClick to go to next row                              
Portland, OR City of Portland Office of Transportation Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented Minimally Implemented N/A Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented Minimally Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Moderately Implemented Moderately Implemented Moderately Implemented N/A Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice N/A N/A
Oregon DOT Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented N/A Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented N/A N/A N/A Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice
Oregon Emergency Management N/A Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice N/A N/A N/A N/A Moderately Implemented Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented N/A N/A N/A N/A Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice
TriMet Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Minimally Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Moderately Implemented N/A Fully Implemented N/A Fully Implemented Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented N/A N/A Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice
San Francisco, CA AC Transit N/A Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Minimally Implemented Minimally Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented N/A Minimally Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented
Bay Area Rapid Transit Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Moderately Implemented Fully Implemented N/A Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice N/A Minimally Implemented Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented Moderately Implemented N/A Moderately Implemented Minimally Implemented Fully Implemented Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented Some Consideration Given but Not Implemented
Caltrans Moderately Implemented Moderately Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Minimally Implemented N/A Moderately Implemented Moderately Implemented Fully Implemented Minimally Implemented Minimally Implemented N/A Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Moderately Implemented Minimally Implemented Minimally Implemented
San Francisco MTA Department of Parking & Traffic Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented Fully Implemented N/A Moderately Implemented N/A Minimally Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented
Metropolitan Transportation Commission Moderately Implemented Moderately Implemented Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice N/A Not Considered in Plans or Implemented in Practice N/A Minimally Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented N/A N/A Fully Implemented Moderately Implemented Fully Implemented Fully Implemented

 

Table 2-3: List of Desirable Elements

   Plans and Practices

Corresponding Question

  1. Integration of transportation into general emergency plans

2

  1. Tailoring of plans to address all types of evacuation and special event scenarios

3

  1. Use of modeling tools to estimate capacity needs and availability

4

  1. Pre-established evacuation routes and traffic control practices

5

  1. Use of transit services and resources, including for special needs evacuees

5

  1. Use of ITS components

6

  1. Appropriate role of transportation agencies in resource and materials management and coordination, including resource staging

7

  1. Use of an incident command system, and integration of transportation into the system

8

  1. Coordination between traffic management centers, transit agencies, and emergency operations centers

8

  1. Coordination among other agencies

8

  1. Procedures for identifying and delegating management activities

8

  1. Protocols for communications between agencies

9

  1. Protocols for communications with evacuees

10

  1. Appropriate testing/training practices

11

  1. Incorporation of lessons learned in exercises and evacuations into plans and practices

15

  1. Incorporation of lessons learned in exercises and evacuations into future training

15

 


June 26, 2006
Publication #FHWA-HOP-08-016