Office of Operations
21st Century Operations Using 21st Century Technologies

7.15 What Worked and What Did Not Work

Evacuations as a result of the incidents were successful; however, as with any emergency, some things worked well and others did not. The following is a summary of this information by the categories of advance planning, coordination, and communication.

7.15.1 What Worked

Advance Planning

  • Ability to adapt to an ever-changing and growing incident
  • Mountain Area Safety Taskforce (MAST)
  • Practice and experience of various entities
  • Pre-established roadblock equipment
  • Preplanning, training and drills
  • Pre-established relationships among entities
  • State of readiness of the local emergency planning committee and knowledge of an eventual major disaster event
  • Training
  • Training exercises—inclusion of hospital in tabletop exercises
  • Training of first responders in incident command
  • Unified incident command
  • Use of the 2-1-1 system for social services
  • Use of the national incident management system.

Coordination

  • Cooperation of the railroads
  • Development of relationships with other entities
  • Establishment of an incident command quickly
  • One person in charge and delegation of responsibilities
  • Overall cooperation of the entities involved
  • Quick implementation of an incident command center
  • Use of the national response plan.

Communication

  • Information to the media and the public
  • Joint information center
  • Media web page.

7.15.2 What Did Not Work

Advance Planning

  • Not all involved entities were represented at the incident command center
  • Staff assignments
  • No identification of all of the chemicals located in the rail car
  • No reentry plan
  • Pumping of the rail car before the identification of the chemicals
  • Sample material did not match the rail car manifest.

Coordination

  • Internal bickering over leadership of the incident command
  • Duplication of effort.

Communication

  • Acquisition of information from others
  • No utilization of existing ITS technology
  • No official evacuation notice to a nursing home
  • Stopped communication.

February 6, 2006
Publication #FHWA-HOP-08-014