Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration
Office of Operations home

MANAGED LANES: A Cross-Cutting Study


Chapter Two. Managed Lanes: State of the Practice


Traditional Lane Management Strategies

State departments of transportation (DOTs) have for many years employed a variety of lane management strategies in an effort to address congestion in urban areas. The earliest of these strategies is the use of controlled access facilities to concentrate ingress and egress points and minimize the effects of weaving and slowing vehicles. Over the years the menu of lane management strategies has grown to encompass a wide range of tools and techniques for maximizing the efficiency of the network. Exhibit 2 lists a variety of lane management strategies in use by transportation agencies. Typically, lane management strategies seek to optimize flow by:

Two common approaches to lane management are restricted use based on vehicle eligibility, and control of access through limited ingress/egress express lanes and ramp metering. Examples of managed lane facilities that represent the state of the practice include high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes and exclusive or special use lanes (3).

Exhibit 2. Eligibility and Access Control as Lane Management Strategies.
Lane Management Strategies
Management Strategy Management Characteristics Management Techniques in Operation

ELIGIBILITY

Eligibility refers to management based on vehicle type or user group.

Occupancy Lanes based on occupancy provide a priority to HOVs. Typically implemented in congested corridors to encourage shift to HOVs. Designed to provide travel time advantage and trip reliability. California, Texas, Washington, Virginia, Minnesota, Colorado, Pennsylvania. Arizona, Florida, Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, New York, New Jersey, Oregon, Tennessee, Hawaii
Vehicle Management based on vehicle type. May provide a superior service as in the case of transit-only facilities. May seek to improve operations by separating vehicles types.
  • Bus-only facilities
    • Pittsburgh, Ottawa, Canada
  • Dual-Dual facility
    • New Jersey Turnpike
  • Separation/Bypass lanes
    • California, Hawaii, Washington Minnesota, Texas, Illinois, New Jersey

ACCESS CONTROL

Limited or controlled access allows management of the flow and throughput of traffic on a facility.

Express Lanes Express lanes have limited access and egress points thereby reducing weaving and disruptions in traffic flow
  • I-90 and I-5, Seattle
  • Dan Ryan Expressway, Chicago
Ramp Meters Meters control the flow of traffic onto a facility to reduce turbulence, resulting in smoother flow.
  • Various cities throughout the US

HOV LANES

High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes, as shown in Exhibit 3, are some of the earliest lane management strategies that provide priority for certain vehicle types. Preferential treatment for transit began in Northern Virginia on I-395 with the bus-only lane in the 1960s. Since then over 2,000 centerline miles of HOV lanes have been developed around the country. HOV is by far the most common managed lane strategy. Most HOV lanes have the common goals of increasing person-movement within a facility by increasing vehicle occupancy, improving transit operations, and providing an attractive mobility choice for travelers in the corridor (4). HOV facilities use vehicle eligibility as the primary mechanism for regulating demand and achieving optimum operating conditions.

picture of an HOV lane
Exhibit 3. HOV Lane

EXCLUSIVE OR SPECIAL USE LANES

This strategy is used to provide an exclusive lane to certain vehicle classifications (Exhibit 4). Most often this is dedicated to buses or large trucks (3). Exclusive bus-only lanes act to provide an incentive to transit riders. By providing a special lane for the exclusive use of buses, these vehicles achieve a travel time advantage as opposed to vehicles in the general-purpose lanes.

aerial photo of the New Jersey turnpike that shows dual-dual section of the roadway
Exhibit 4. Dual-Dual Roadway (6)

Truck lanes operate in much the same fashion as bus-only lanes. However, the objective is different. The goal in separating truck traffic from passenger traffic is to improve the flow of a facility and provide an increased level of safety by reducing possible conflicts between large trucks and other vehicles. Separate truck lanes may be feasible in areas where truck volumes exceed 30 percent of vehicular traffic, peak-hour volumes exceed 1800 vehicles per lane-hour, and off-peak volumes exceed 1200 vehicles per lane-hour (3). Exclusive lanes use vehicle eligibility to achieve operational objectives.


Back to Top

Previous | Table of Contents | Next

Office of Operations