US 50 Integrated Corridor Management – Sacramento Region

Printable Version [PDF, 3.7MB]
You may need the Adobe® Reader® to view the PDFs on this page.
Contact Information: Operations Feedback at OperationsFeedback@dot.gov

U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Operations
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

---

Table of Contents

COVER PAGE
1.	INTRODUCTION
2.	ENTITIES ENTERING INTO AGREEMENT WITH FHWA
3.	PROJECT BOUNDARIES
4.	US 50 CORRIDOR CHALLENGES AND ISSUES
5.	TRANSPORATION SYSTEMS AND SERVICES
6.	DEPLOYMENT PLAN (ConOps TOO)
	Formalize Partnership Group
	Inter-Agency Agreements (Letters of Support)
	Develop System Engineering Plan
	Development Strategy and Phased Implementation
	Procurement Strategy
7.	INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES
8.	QUANTIFIABLE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS
	Improve System Performance (Mobility, Safety, Reliability, Productivity)
	Provide Transporation Choices
	Improve Environment (GHG Emissions, Green Infrastructure)
9.	QUANTIFIABLE SAFETY, MOBILITY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFIT PROJECTIONS
10.	VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES
11.	ENHANCING AND SUSTAINING PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS
12.	LEVERAGING AND OPTIMIZING EXISTING LOCAL AND REGIONAL ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY
13.	DEPLOYMENT SCHEDULE
14.	LEVERAGING OF ITS PROGRAM/INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES
15.	Redacted
MALCOLM DOUGHERTY, DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORATION
SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SACOG)
EL DORADO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT
YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORATION DISTRICT

List of Figures

Figure 1	US 50 ICM Corridor Segments
Figure 2	2014 and 2016 Incidents by Route
Figure 3	2016 VMT and VHD by Route
Figure 4	Typical Public Response to an Incident
Figure 5	ICM Approach to Redistributed Demand

List of Tables

Table 1	US 50 ICM Project Cost Estimate
Table 2	TASA and CHP CAD Incident Data
Table 3	District 3 Caltrans Performance Management System – VMT and VHD
Table 4	US 50 ICM Corridor Attributes
Table 5	Market Package Analysis (Regional ITS Architecture 2006 version)
Table 6	Projected ICM Project Benefits in San Diego, Dallas, and Minneapolis
Table 7	RCTO Goals & Objectives and District Performance Targets
Table 8	US 50 ICM Project – Deployment Schedule for Segments 1 and 2