Office of Operations Freight Management and Operations

Appendices

  1. Agenda
  2. Course Criteria
  3. Training Needs
  4. Course Audience
  5. Attendee List

Appendix A - Agenda


Freight and the Environment Charrette
February 9, 2005
8:30 am – 4:30 pm
USDOT Headquarters – Room 3329
Washington, DC


Time Session Presenter/Format

8:30

Welcome and Introductions

Purpose of Charrette

Attendee Introductions

Tony Furst, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations

9:05 Background Briefing/Scene Setter Sergio Ostria, ICF Consulting
9:15 Overview of Process April Armstrong, SAIC
empty cell Process Steps empty cell

9:30

Step 1: Envisioning Exercise

Participants will be broken into "like" groups and asked to envision:

What made this course a success?
What are some of they key results/outcomes (be specific)?
Who is praising this course (name names or kinds of people, and publications)?
What are they saying (Quotes)?
Other

Shared Perspective Breakout Groups

10:30 Break empty cell

10:40

Step 2: Establishment of Scoping Criteria

Based on the vision we've now begun to define, what criteria should be used in consideration of candidate topic areas for the proposed course?

Examples (a few are fine):
Topic relates to both freight and environmental considerations/impacts
The topic promotes and/or supports economically-viable solution options for freight
The topic promotes and/or supports improved mobility for passenger/freight transportation
The topic would enable the student to take action or additional actions in that area in their job associated with freight projects;
Topic is not sufficiently covered in other courses;
Etc.

Shared Perspective Breakout Groups

11:30

Lunch

Attendees will have 30 minutes to go to the cafeteria and get lunch and should return to the conference room by 12:00 to continue with Step 3 while eating lunch.

empty cell

12:00

Step 3: Identification of Training Needs

What issues do you face in your job related to environmental impacts or considerations associated with freight projects?

What other issues do you sense are "out there" that may need to be addressed in this Freight and the Environment training course?

For each issue you identify, identify the types of professionals you feel have to deal with this issue in the course of their jobs and the impact you believe the issue has on the success of their efforts and projects:

Describe #3 in terms of:

  1. Type of professional (State DOT, MPO, etc.);
  2. Title of professional (project planner, etc.
  3. Years of experience.
  4. Impact of issue on this professional

Shared Perspective Breakout Groups

1:00

Step 4: "Testing" of Training Needs

(5) Does this issue satisfy the criteria we've defined? If not, does the issue need to be clarified further? Modified? Do the criteria need to be modified? Or are there any "Parking Lot" issues that need to be set aside for further consideration at a later time?

Mixed Perspective Breakout Groups

1:30 Break empty cell

1:40

Step 5: Identification of Training Needs—Cont.

(6) What specific strategies, techniques, tools, references or other resources are available to assist with dealing with these issues?

(7) What notable practices have you implemented or closely observed (within these strategies) that you feel should be shared with others?

Shared Perspective Breakout Groups

2:20 Step 6: Identification of Learning Objectives Shared Perspective Breakout Groups

3:00

Break/Step 7: Prioritization of Training Needs

Attendees will have a 10 minute break but will be asked to prioritize the issue list using colored dots before they go on break.

Large Group

3:10

Step 8: Confirmation of Target Audience

(8) Let's review our needs descriptions and audiences affected by those needs. Are there any target audiences missing from out list? Are there any audiences on our list that don't belong on our list?

Large Group

3:40

Step 9: Confirmation of Course Outcomes

(9) Based on the totality of work done today, the lesson areas we've defined, the target audiences we've identified, what specific Course Outcomes do we want to suggest for this course as a whole? The outcomes should be specific and measurable, but should apply to the course as a whole rather than any particular lesson area.

Mixed Perspective

empty cell Conclusion empty cell
4:10 Summary of What Was Heard Jennifer Seplow, SAIC
4:20 Feedback on Day/Process April Armstrong, SAIC
4:30 Adjourn empty cell

Appendix B – Course Criteria

MPO/Port Group

  • The course should address basic issues/the big picture of freight & the environment
  • Topics should enlighten participants about institutional issues/obstacles/barriers – i.e., time horizons for decision making
  • Should address why environment is an issue
  • Should address regulation and modal specificity
  • Keep in mind that time is money
  • Identify strategies to be used in the field and provide tools to be used in the field once you get out of the course; address applications for applying tools
  • Should identify roles of stakeholders
  • Address relationship building, understanding of different cultures and mindsets, how to do win-win negotiations
  • The course should give students the ability to set up performance measures – how do you measure environmental protection in the field; provide examples of performance measures
  • Offer examples of win-win outcomes, such as examples and case studies
  • Course wouldn't be worthwhile for public sector unless they could come and learn from the private sector – course should have mixed audience, private sector representatives to provide examples
  • Course could be provided to a multi-stakeholder group that already has a problem or issue to work on – course would help group work on their problem. This might be more of a workshop format.

State DOT Group

  • The course should actually be two courses – one with a public sector view at a political level, gov't officials level. The other is a technical level course – address regulatory type issues with environment.
  • Big picture overview, understand how freight fits into transportation planning process, how does freight affect environment
  • Focus on environment and freight priority issues
  • Cover topics in multi-modal perspective
  • Communicate pros and cons and benefits
  • Address range of planning through PE process – how does freight affect you in planning process up through preliminary engineering
  • Joining of public and private sector
  • Focus on things that are solvable issues, don't focus on futuristic things that can't be immediately resolved
  • Mapping freight mobility to addressing environment issues – what are mobility issues, what infrastructure is an impediment, then address environmental issues involved
  • Develop tools and strategies to prevent lawsuits and enhance streamlining
  • Look at future challenges – how does this affect us in the long range, i.e. the ozone layer
  • Enable action to take freight projects quickly through the process – streamline the process
  • Enable action to develop and quickly address freight projects that are beneficial to the environment – environmental stewardship project.
    • What is an environmental steward? – include this in big picture overview
  • Providing an understanding of heath and ecological impacts and an understanding of the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act and success stories for technology and logistical improvements.
  • Themes between two groups are common
    • Both groups talked about big picture – clearly a need to have a course that paints the big picture
    • Need to explain various players, the process – going from planning through implementation
    • Understand the constraints that different perspectives are dealing with
    • Identify shared goals that all can agree on – win/win theme
    • Need for public and private attendance
    • Need for practical, solvable issues being addressed – what can we do today?
    • Enabling action – one group talked about having a mixed group working on a project attend a course, other group talked about enabling action to develop a freight project

Appendix C – Training Needs


Table A. State DOT (Red) Group
Issue/Training Need Audience Impacts
  1. Transportation professionals need to understand air quality standards and constraints, how to quantify air quality effects and reduce emissions to include identifying alternate fuels.
    Specifically:
    • Conformity
    • Project (hot spot)
    • CMAQ
  • DOT/MPO Planners
  • Air Quality Modelers
  • Chambers of Commerce
  • Economic Development
  • Industry Associations
  • Economic development
  • Funding
  • Health
  1. Transportation professionals need to be able to identify noise impacts and mitigation strategies for those impacts; what regulations apply to dealing with noise.

Note: All modes have noise issues but the issues are different among modes.

  • NEPA document writers (Federal $ or approval)
  • Noise modeler/abatement engineer
  • Designers/architects
  • Facility owners
empty cell
  1. Transportation professionals must understand cumulative and secondary impacts of and solutions for:
    • Land use/consumption
    • Reduce VMT
    • Mode shift
    • Congestion management
  • DOT/MPO Planners
  • NEPA Document Writers
  • Regional Development Commissions/Councils
  • Localities
  • Economic development
  • Delays NEPA
  • Community concerns
  • Don't get best outcomes
  • Money – more costly
  1. Transportation planners need to understand how to deal with contaminated soil and dredge materials.
    Specifically:
    • Removal
    • Where to put it (re-use)
  • State Environmental Engineer (permit writer)
  • DOT Environmental Engineer
  • Regional Corps of Engineers Permit Writers
  • Port Authorities
  • U.S. Coast Guard
  • Environmental Scientists
empty cell
  1. Transportation professionals need to understand how to move HAZMAT/waste materials with minimal risk.
  • HAZMAT (specialists, carriers/permitters, inspectors)
  • EMS Staff
  • DOT Permitters
  • DOT/MPO Planners – designated corridors
  • TSA
  • localities
  • Risk for health, transportation system circulation, economy, mobility
  • Credibility can be lost
  • Economic/environmental costs
  • Financial risk
  • Equity/Environmental Justice
  1. Transportation professionals need to understand project impacts on global climate change and energy consumption and use, and how to reduce these impacts.
  • Energy authorities
  • DOT/MPO Planner
  • Fleet and equipment owners
  • Environmental planners
  • DOT infrastructure
  • Global warming – worsens ozone problem
  • Reduced fuel economy
  • Energy security

Table B. MPO/Port (Green) Group
Issue/Training Need Audience Impacts
  1. There is a need for an understanding of the impacts of truck idling on the environment.
  • Directors and operations staff of intermodal terminals
  • Executive director of state or regional air agency
  • State DOT transportation planning manager
  • State DOT environmental (planning) manager
  • MPO (transportation planners/managers, environmental planners/managers, long and short range planners)
  • State EPA transportation manager
  • Federal EPA modal staff
  • State legislatures/staff
  • Citizens Committee/Environmental Justice representatives
  • Concerned environmental/citizen groups
  • Consultant organizations dealing with air quality
  • Local officials near terminals or truck rest stops
  • Educational professionals
empty cell
  1. There is a need to create analytical tools to measure the impacts of truck idling.

This ranges from base year data collection, historic trends, international shipping trends, variations of freight by mode and distance time, future projections of modal split, commodity type, and overall vehicle volumes. All of this should have a time of day/season of year component.

  • MPO (transportation/air quality modelers, long range plan manager, freight planning manager, senior level management)
  • Intermodal terminal owners and operators
  • State DOT (air quality planners, senior level management)
  • Motor trucking industry managers and owners
  • Railroad terminal managers
  • Port terminal managers
  • Concerned environmental groups
  • Public health managers and professionals
  • Railroad capital planners
  • This really should focus on folks selecting projects for CMAQ funds and folks writing SIPs.
empty cell
  1. There is a need to identify strategies to use alternative fuels.
  • MPO (air quality planners, freight planners, senior level management and staff)
  • DOT (air quality planners, freight planners, senior level management)
  • EPA air quality planners
  • Corps of Engineers air quality and environmental planners
  • University and education professionals (transportation and environmental engineering professionals)
  • Fleet managers
  • Terminal/hub managers
  • Truck stop operators
empty cell
  1. There is a need to develop public/private funding strategies.
  • Terminal managers
  • State DOT financial people and economic development reps.
  • MPO freight managers
  • Railroad (economic development/sales representatives, government affairs managers)
  • Trucking association representatives
  • Environmental/community group leaders
  • FHWA
  • Corps of Engineers
  • Local government (transportation, public works, economic development)
  • TIF/PID/BID administrators
  • Chambers of commerce
  • Legislators (state and federal)
  • Major shippers
  • Rail associations
empty cell
  1. There is a need to understand the relationship between freight and economic justice.
  • Site selection companies/personnel
  • Governmental affairs managers
  • CEOs
  • MPO (MTP "authors")
  • State DOT (state plan "authors", civil rights managers)
  • Local government (land use planners and economic development personnel)
  • Waterport/airport development managers and environmental compliance managers
  • Local and County (community board representatives, commissioners, elected officials, economic development managers)
  • State economic development managers
  • Federal civil rights managers
empty cell
  1. Develop strategies to reduce truck VMT.
  • MPO planners
  • Private terminal planners
  • DOT planners
  • Port Authority transportation planners
  • Trucking company logistic managers
  • Economic development planners
  • Logistics managers for shippers
  • Trucking association directors or government affairs managers
  • Terminal managers (rail, port, planned industrial centers)
  • State DOT truck program managers
  • Turnpike/toll road authorities managers
empty cell
  1. Identify how locational decisions impact truck VMT.
  • Logistics managers for shippers
  • MPO (planners and senior level management)
  • State and city DOT planners
  • Trucking company logistic managers
  • Port Authority transportation managers
  • Economists (e.g., MPOs, DOTs, regional economic development authorities)
  • City planners
  • Planning commissioners (board)
  • Rail planners
  • Department of Environmental Protection – remediation program manager
  • State economic development agencies – project managers
  • Heads of commercial development companies
  • Warehouse and developer associations – managers (National Association of Industrial and Office Properties, NIT Lead associations managers in each state, council of logistics management)
  • Port terminal managers
  • Chamber of commerce
empty cell
  1. There is a need to share success stories of what did work (e.g., Alameda Corridor).
  • MPO (long range planner, TIP planner, local planner, environmental planning staff, community development manager, freight planners, senior level management and staff, land use planners)
  • State DOT (freight planning manager, environmental manager)
  • State EPA transportation manager
  • Trucking association director
  • Rail association director
  • Port director (sea/air)
  • Terminal manager or association
  • Local government economic development staff
  • Trade organizations – government relations staff
  • County and city transportation planners
  • University planning departments, professors, students
  • Railroad governmental affairs
  • Corporate governmental affairs staff
empty cell
  1. There is a need to develop cost/benefits of freight projects.

Note: Railroads already have this and could teach it if they were not so afraid of giving away proprietary knowledge.

  • MPO planners
  • Project selectors – TIP manager
  • Local government capital planners (public works, transportation, economic development departments)
  • State DOT (freight planners, budget/financial professionals, grant managers)
  • Port authority
empty cell
  1. There is a need to increase agency awareness of the broad impacts of freight.
  • MPO (long range planners, transportation/air quality managers, capital programming managers, freight program managers)
  • Local government planners
  • State DOT (long range plan managers, capital programming managers)
  • Educational institutions – planning school professionals or development people
  • Environmental organizations – transportation planners
empty cell
  1. There is a need to understand railroad capacity issues and grade crossings.
  • State DOT (planners, engineers, senior level managers, economic development managers)
  • MPO (air quality planners, long range and short range planners)
  • Environmental organizations (transportation planners, economic justice planners)
  • Railroad (operations personnel, marketing/sales development planners and managers)
empty cell

Appendix D – Course Audience


Audience Number of Issues
State/City DOT (state plan "authors", civil rights managers, truck program managers, air quality planners, freight planners, senior level management, environmental engineers, permitters, economists, economic development managers) 16
MPOs (air quality planner, long range planner, TIP planner, local planner, environmental planning staff, community development manager, freight planners, senior level management and staff, land use planners, capital programming managers, MTP "authors") 15
Port Authorities/Terminal Mangers (sea/air) 9
Environmental organizations/EPA (transportation planners, economic justice planners, scientists, community/group leaders, EPA air quality planners, permit writers) 9
Local and County government (community board representatives, commissioners, elected officials, economic development managers, land use planners, economic development personnel, public works) 9
Rail (associations, planners, economic development, marketing/sales representatives, government affairs managers, operations personnel, capital planners, terminal managers) 8
Trucking (associations, truck stop operators, government affairs managers, logistics managers) 6
Educational institutions – planning school professionals or development people, students 4
Chamber of commerce 3
Corps of Engineers 3
Economic Development 3
City planners 2
Concerned environmental groups 2
Fleet and equipment owners/managers 2
Logistics managers for shippers 2
NEPA Document Writers 2
State economic development agencies 2
Air Quality Modelers empty cell
CEOs empty cell
Citizens Committee/Environmental Justice representatives empty cell
Consultant organizations dealing with air quality empty cell
Corporate governmental affairs staff empty cell
Department of Environmental Protection – remediation program manager empty cell
Designers/architects empty cell
Directors and operations staff of intermodal terminals empty cell
EMS Staff empty cell
Energy authorities empty cell
Executive director of state or regional air agency empty cell
Facility owners empty cell
Federal civil rights managers empty cell
FHWA empty cell
Governmental affairs managers empty cell
HAZMAT (specialists, carriers/permitters, inspectors) empty cell
Heads of commercial development companies empty cell
Industry Associations empty cell
Intermodal terminal owners and operators empty cell
Legislators (state and federal) empty cell
Major shippers empty cell
Motor trucking industry managers and owners empty cell
Noise modeler/abatement engineer empty cell
Planning commissioners (board) empty cell
Project selectors – TIP manager empty cell
Public health managers and professionals empty cell
Regional Development Commissions/Councils empty cell
Site selection companies/personnel empty cell
State legislatures/staff empty cell
People responsible for selecting projects for CMAQ funds and folks writing SIPs. empty cell
TIF/PID/BID administrators empty cell
Trade organizations – government relations staff empty cell
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) empty cell
Turnpike/toll road authorities managers empty cell
U.S. Coast Guard empty cell
Warehouse and developer associations – managers (National Association of Industrial and Office Properties, NIT Lead associations managers in each state, council of logistics management) empty cell

Appendix E – Attendance List


Name Organization Email Phone
John Tompkins Minnesota DOT john.tompkins@dot.state.mn.us empty cell
John Zamurs

New York DOT

Air Quality/Asbestos/Energy Section

jzamurs@gw.dot.state.ny.us (518) 457-5646
Jeanne Stevens Tennessee DOT, Director of Planning jeanne.stevens@state.tn.us (615) 741-3421
Fred Wise Florida DOT fred.wise@dot.state.fl.us (850) 414-4500
Amy Costello Virginia DOT Environment/AQ section amy.costello@vdot.virginia.gov (804) 371-6773
Ken Adler US EPA adler.ken@epa.gov (202) 343-9402
Earl Washington Houston-Galveston Area Council (HGAC) earl.washington@h-gac.com (713) 993-2494
Mike Sims North Central Texas Council of Governments msims@nctcog.org empty cell
Caroline Marshall Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) cmarshall@atlantaregional.com (404) 463-3285
John Hummer Northern Jersey Transportation Planning Authority (NJTPA) jhummer@njtpa.org (973) 639-8424
Karen Ryan Tobia Port Authority of NY and NJ ktobia@panynj.gov (212) 435-7841
Nancy Pfeffer Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) pfeffer@scag.ca.gov (213) 236-1869
Ted Dahlburg Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) tdahlburg@dvrpc.org (215) 238-2844
Kathleen Bailey US EPA bailey.kathleen@epa.gov (202) 566-2953

previous
Office of Operations