Appendices
Appendix A - Agenda
Freight and the Environment Charrette
February 9, 2005
8:30 am – 4:30 pm
USDOT Headquarters – Room 3329
Washington, DC
| Time | Session | Presenter/Format |
|---|---|---|
8:30 |
Welcome and Introductions Purpose of Charrette Attendee Introductions |
Tony Furst, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations |
| 9:05 | Background Briefing/Scene Setter | Sergio Ostria, ICF Consulting |
| 9:15 | Overview of Process | April Armstrong, SAIC |
| Process Steps | ||
9:30 |
Step 1: Envisioning Exercise Participants will be broken into "like" groups and asked to envision: What made this course a success? |
Shared Perspective Breakout Groups |
| 10:30 | Break | |
10:40 |
Step 2: Establishment of Scoping Criteria Based on the vision we've now begun to define, what criteria should be used in consideration of candidate topic areas for the proposed course? Examples (a few are fine): |
Shared Perspective Breakout Groups |
11:30 |
Lunch Attendees will have 30 minutes to go to the cafeteria and get lunch and should return to the conference room by 12:00 to continue with Step 3 while eating lunch. |
|
12:00 |
Step 3: Identification of Training Needs What issues do you face in your job related to environmental impacts or considerations associated with freight projects? What other issues do you sense are "out there" that may need to be addressed in this Freight and the Environment training course? For each issue you identify, identify the types of professionals you feel have to deal with this issue in the course of their jobs and the impact you believe the issue has on the success of their efforts and projects: Describe #3 in terms of:
|
Shared Perspective Breakout Groups |
1:00 |
Step 4: "Testing" of Training Needs (5) Does this issue satisfy the criteria we've defined? If not, does the issue need to be clarified further? Modified? Do the criteria need to be modified? Or are there any "Parking Lot" issues that need to be set aside for further consideration at a later time? |
Mixed Perspective Breakout Groups |
| 1:30 | Break | |
1:40 |
Step 5: Identification of Training Needs—Cont. (6) What specific strategies, techniques, tools, references or other resources are available to assist with dealing with these issues? (7) What notable practices have you implemented or closely observed (within these strategies) that you feel should be shared with others? |
Shared Perspective Breakout Groups |
| 2:20 | Step 6: Identification of Learning Objectives | Shared Perspective Breakout Groups |
3:00 |
Break/Step 7: Prioritization of Training Needs Attendees will have a 10 minute break but will be asked to prioritize the issue list using colored dots before they go on break. |
Large Group |
3:10 |
Step 8: Confirmation of Target Audience (8) Let's review our needs descriptions and audiences affected by those needs. Are there any target audiences missing from out list? Are there any audiences on our list that don't belong on our list? |
Large Group |
3:40 |
Step 9: Confirmation of Course Outcomes (9) Based on the totality of work done today, the lesson areas we've defined, the target audiences we've identified, what specific Course Outcomes do we want to suggest for this course as a whole? The outcomes should be specific and measurable, but should apply to the course as a whole rather than any particular lesson area. |
Mixed Perspective |
| Conclusion | ||
| 4:10 | Summary of What Was Heard | Jennifer Seplow, SAIC |
| 4:20 | Feedback on Day/Process | April Armstrong, SAIC |
| 4:30 | Adjourn |
Appendix B – Course Criteria
MPO/Port Group
- The course should address basic issues/the big picture of freight & the environment
- Topics should enlighten participants about institutional issues/obstacles/barriers – i.e., time horizons for decision making
- Should address why environment is an issue
- Should address regulation and modal specificity
- Keep in mind that time is money
- Identify strategies to be used in the field and provide tools to be used in the field once you get out of the course; address applications for applying tools
- Should identify roles of stakeholders
- Address relationship building, understanding of different cultures and mindsets, how to do win-win negotiations
- The course should give students the ability to set up performance measures – how do you measure environmental protection in the field; provide examples of performance measures
- Offer examples of win-win outcomes, such as examples and case studies
- Course wouldn't be worthwhile for public sector unless they could come and learn from the private sector – course should have mixed audience, private sector representatives to provide examples
- Course could be provided to a multi-stakeholder group that already has a problem or issue to work on – course would help group work on their problem. This might be more of a workshop format.
State DOT Group
- The course should actually be two courses – one with a public sector view at a political level, gov't officials level. The other is a technical level course – address regulatory type issues with environment.
- Big picture overview, understand how freight fits into transportation planning process, how does freight affect environment
- Focus on environment and freight priority issues
- Cover topics in multi-modal perspective
- Communicate pros and cons and benefits
- Address range of planning through PE process – how does freight affect you in planning process up through preliminary engineering
- Joining of public and private sector
- Focus on things that are solvable issues, don't focus on futuristic things that can't be immediately resolved
- Mapping freight mobility to addressing environment issues – what are mobility issues, what infrastructure is an impediment, then address environmental issues involved
- Develop tools and strategies to prevent lawsuits and enhance streamlining
- Look at future challenges – how does this affect us in the long range, i.e. the ozone layer
- Enable action to take freight projects quickly through the process – streamline the process
- Enable action to develop and quickly address freight projects that are beneficial to the environment – environmental stewardship project.
- What is an environmental steward? – include this in big picture overview
- Providing an understanding of heath and ecological impacts and an understanding of the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act and success stories for technology and logistical improvements.
- Themes between two groups are common
- Both groups talked about big picture – clearly a need to have a course that paints the big picture
- Need to explain various players, the process – going from planning through implementation
- Understand the constraints that different perspectives are dealing with
- Identify shared goals that all can agree on – win/win theme
- Need for public and private attendance
- Need for practical, solvable issues being addressed – what can we do today?
- Enabling action – one group talked about having a mixed group working on a project attend a course, other group talked about enabling action to develop a freight project
Appendix C – Training Needs
| Issue/Training Need | Audience | Impacts |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Note: All modes have noise issues but the issues are different among modes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue/Training Need | Audience | Impacts |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
This ranges from base year data collection, historic trends, international shipping trends, variations of freight by mode and distance time, future projections of modal split, commodity type, and overall vehicle volumes. All of this should have a time of day/season of year component. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Railroads already have this and could teach it if they were not so afraid of giving away proprietary knowledge. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendix D – Course Audience
| Audience | Number of Issues |
|---|---|
| State/City DOT (state plan "authors", civil rights managers, truck program managers, air quality planners, freight planners, senior level management, environmental engineers, permitters, economists, economic development managers) | 16 |
| MPOs (air quality planner, long range planner, TIP planner, local planner, environmental planning staff, community development manager, freight planners, senior level management and staff, land use planners, capital programming managers, MTP "authors") | 15 |
| Port Authorities/Terminal Mangers (sea/air) | 9 |
| Environmental organizations/EPA (transportation planners, economic justice planners, scientists, community/group leaders, EPA air quality planners, permit writers) | 9 |
| Local and County government (community board representatives, commissioners, elected officials, economic development managers, land use planners, economic development personnel, public works) | 9 |
| Rail (associations, planners, economic development, marketing/sales representatives, government affairs managers, operations personnel, capital planners, terminal managers) | 8 |
| Trucking (associations, truck stop operators, government affairs managers, logistics managers) | 6 |
| Educational institutions – planning school professionals or development people, students | 4 |
| Chamber of commerce | 3 |
| Corps of Engineers | 3 |
| Economic Development | 3 |
| City planners | 2 |
| Concerned environmental groups | 2 |
| Fleet and equipment owners/managers | 2 |
| Logistics managers for shippers | 2 |
| NEPA Document Writers | 2 |
| State economic development agencies | 2 |
| Air Quality Modelers | |
| CEOs | |
| Citizens Committee/Environmental Justice representatives | |
| Consultant organizations dealing with air quality | |
| Corporate governmental affairs staff | |
| Department of Environmental Protection – remediation program manager | |
| Designers/architects | |
| Directors and operations staff of intermodal terminals | |
| EMS Staff | |
| Energy authorities | |
| Executive director of state or regional air agency | |
| Facility owners | |
| Federal civil rights managers | |
| FHWA | |
| Governmental affairs managers | |
| HAZMAT (specialists, carriers/permitters, inspectors) | |
| Heads of commercial development companies | |
| Industry Associations | |
| Intermodal terminal owners and operators | |
| Legislators (state and federal) | |
| Major shippers | |
| Motor trucking industry managers and owners | |
| Noise modeler/abatement engineer | |
| Planning commissioners (board) | |
| Project selectors – TIP manager | |
| Public health managers and professionals | |
| Regional Development Commissions/Councils | |
| Site selection companies/personnel | |
| State legislatures/staff | |
| People responsible for selecting projects for CMAQ funds and folks writing SIPs. | |
| TIF/PID/BID administrators | |
| Trade organizations – government relations staff | |
| Transportation Security Administration (TSA) | |
| Turnpike/toll road authorities managers | |
| U.S. Coast Guard | |
| Warehouse and developer associations – managers (National Association of Industrial and Office Properties, NIT Lead associations managers in each state, council of logistics management) |
Appendix E – Attendance List
| Name | Organization | Phone | |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Tompkins | Minnesota DOT | john.tompkins@dot.state.mn.us | |
| John Zamurs | New York DOT Air Quality/Asbestos/Energy Section |
jzamurs@gw.dot.state.ny.us | (518) 457-5646 |
| Jeanne Stevens | Tennessee DOT, Director of Planning | jeanne.stevens@state.tn.us | (615) 741-3421 |
| Fred Wise | Florida DOT | fred.wise@dot.state.fl.us | (850) 414-4500 |
| Amy Costello | Virginia DOT Environment/AQ section | amy.costello@vdot.virginia.gov | (804) 371-6773 |
| Ken Adler | US EPA | adler.ken@epa.gov | (202) 343-9402 |
| Earl Washington | Houston-Galveston Area Council (HGAC) | earl.washington@h-gac.com | (713) 993-2494 |
| Mike Sims | North Central Texas Council of Governments | msims@nctcog.org | |
| Caroline Marshall | Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) | cmarshall@atlantaregional.com | (404) 463-3285 |
| John Hummer | Northern Jersey Transportation Planning Authority (NJTPA) | jhummer@njtpa.org | (973) 639-8424 |
| Karen Ryan Tobia | Port Authority of NY and NJ | ktobia@panynj.gov | (212) 435-7841 |
| Nancy Pfeffer | Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) | pfeffer@scag.ca.gov | (213) 236-1869 |
| Ted Dahlburg | Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) | tdahlburg@dvrpc.org | (215) 238-2844 |
| Kathleen Bailey | US EPA | bailey.kathleen@epa.gov | (202) 566-2953 |